My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/26/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
10/26/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:08 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:43:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/26/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, TO UPHOLD THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING <br />COMMISSION PERTAINING TO ITEM #7 AS ADVERTISED. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE <br />4A POPULAR COMMENT, BUT STATED HE BELIEVED THAT THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE <br />THAT WANT TO SEE SOME IMPROVEMENTS AND CHANGES TO THIS COMMUNITY AND <br />THOSE PEOPLE ARE NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTED HERE TODAY. HE FELT <br />THERE IS A NEED FOR THE HIGHER DENSITY FOR THE MULTI -FAMILY TYPE OF <br />DEVELOPMENT AND NOTED THAT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS <br />NOT THE MOST ECONOMICAL AND FEASIBLE WAY TO GO INTO DEVELOPMENT. IT <br />IS BETTER TO CLUSTER THE HOMES AND HAVE MORE OPEN SPACE. COMMISSIONER <br />SCHMUCKER STATED THAT NOT EVERYONE WANTS TO HAVE A YARD AROUND HIS HOUSE <br />OR MAINTAIN ONE, AND THIS IS WHY CONDOMINIUMS AND MULTIFAMILY DEVELOP- <br />MENTS ARE BECOMING POPULAR. HE FELT SUCH DEVELOPMENT CAN BE DONE IN <br />A GOOD MANNER AND WILL NOT NECESSARILY DESTROY THE COMMUNITY. HE <br />FURTHER NOTED THAT THIS PROPERTY WILL EVENTUALLY COST SO MUCH THAT IT <br />WILL BE UNREASONABLE AND UNFEASIBLE NOT TO HAVE SOME MULTI -FAMILY <br />DEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT THAT <br />WE ARE TALKING ABOUT CHANGES FOR THE FUTURE - NOT TODAY OR TOMORROW, <br />AND WHEN DEVELOPMENTS LIKE THIS AREN'T PLANNED FOR THE FUTURE, THEN <br />YOU MAKE MILLIONAIRES OUT OFA FEW PEOPLE. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE AGREED WITH THE -MOTION, AND <br />FELT THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD, ALTHOUGH THERE WAS A SPLIT <br />DECISION, REACHED THE RIGHT DECISION. HE DID'STRONGLY FEEL THERE WILL <br />BE A DEFINITE NEED FOR COMMERCIAL AND A BUFFER AREA HERE IN THE FUTURE, <br />BUT WE ARE NOT READY FOR THE CHANGE YET. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED WITH COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER VOTING IN OPPOSITION. <br />ITEM #9. <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK PRESENTED SLIDES AND NOTED THAT THIS <br />CHANGE WAS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED BY EARL PADGETT WITH THE CONCURRENCE <br />OF THE LATE PLANNING DIRECTOR VAL BRENNAN. THE ORIGINAL PROPOSED <br />CHANGE CALLED FOR A MEDIUM DENSITY AREA TO THE EAST OF STATE HIGHWAY <br />A71 -A WITH A COMMERCIAL AREA WEST OF A -1-A WITH ADDITIONAL MEDIUM <br />DENSITY TO THE NORTH OF THE COMMERCIAL AREA. PETITIONS PRESENTED IN <br />4 <br />OCT 2 61978 3 120 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.