Laserfiche WebLink
Discussion ensued regarding Senate Bill 360 and whether it would serve the pending <br />ordinance. Director Keating advised Commissioner Davis that the County had already adopted the <br />proportionate share ordinance and that it was a requirement of the State. He explained that the <br />biggest challenge would be for the developers, because they probably would not get financing for <br />their infrastructure improvements. <br />A lengthy question and answer period continued as the Commissioners sought <br />details from staff <br />the motion. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner O'Bryan, <br />SECONDED by Vice Chair Bowden, to accept staff's <br />recommendation as presented. <br />Chairman Wheeler, Commissioners Davis and Flescher said they could not support <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and by a vote <br />of 2-3, (Chairman Wheeler, Commissioners Davis and <br />Flescher opposed), the MOTION FAILED. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Davis, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Flescher, to adopt the <br />current Land Development Regulations Chapter 910 <br />"pending" ordinance, with revision allowing vesting only at <br />time of building permit issuance, except for proportionate <br />share agreements and other types of guaranteed <br />improvement situations. <br />January 23, 2007 17 <br />