Laserfiche WebLink
There were no additional speakers and the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br />Vice Chair Bowden asked Attorney Collins when the pending ordinance was <br />adopted. Attorney Collins said it had been since October 4, 2005. He summarized the idea of a <br />pending ordinance and why it had been held -up. He did not feel that the pending ordinance should <br />be dragged -out any longer and thought the staff report should be adopted, then tweaked as needed. <br />Commissioner Davis voiced how important it was to keep "vesting at building <br />permit" on the table. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan questioned Directing Keating for clarification regarding the <br />proposed wording of rationing and wanted to ensure that small sites would still allow remaining <br />capacity on that link. Director Keating said that it would, as long as the capacity remained. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan thought the traffic situation still needed work and suggested the Board <br />support the recommendation of the traffic consultant. <br />Vice Chair Bowden commented that traffic in the community was a quality of life <br />issue and asked if the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) should be used since it was so old, or if <br />there was something easier and better that could be utilized. Discussion ensued and Mr. Mora <br />explained that even though the HCS was old, it was continually updated. <br />Chairman Wheeler summarized what had been said then voiced that he did not think <br />it was necessary to have another workshop. He favored vesting at building permit and wanted to <br />see the pending ordinance become permanent, then critique as needed. <br />Commissioner Davis agreed, however, he felt that the pending ordinance should <br />also allow for proportionate share or other guaranteed agreements for major road improvements. <br />January 23, 2007 16 <br />