Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />SHE POINTED OUT THAT THEY PURCHASED THEIR PROPERTY MANY YEARS AGO <br />WHEN THE MOBILE HOME PARK WAS CONSIDERABLY SMALLER AND BEFORE VERO <br />SHORES WAS DEVELOPED. IRS. BIDLINGMAYER STATED THAT THE PROPOSAL <br />PRESENTED TO THE BOARD REPRESENTS A COMPROMISE FOR VERO SHORES, BUT <br />NO PROVISION HAS BEEN MADE FOR HER PROPERTY. SHE REQUESTED AS AN <br />ABSOLUTE MINIMUM A 59' BUFFER STRIP SIMILAR TO THE ONE WHICH IS PROPOSED <br />TO SEPARATE VERO SHORES FROM THE PARK AREA. SHE CONTINUED THAT THEY <br />HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT THE OPEN DITCH AND OPEN DRIVEWAY IS THEIR BUFFER <br />ZONE, BUT POINTED OUT THAT THIS DITCH AND DRIVEWAY MUST REMAIN OPEN AND <br />FURTHER NOTED THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN VERO SHORES DID NOT ACCEPT <br />THE STREET RIGHT—OF—!'JAY AS AN ADEQUATE BUFFER. "IRS. ')IDLINGMAYER ALSO <br />NOTED THAT THE 25' DITCH IS THEIR LAND W41C4 THEY DONATED, SHE <br />REQUESTED THAT THE BUFFER STRIP BE DEFINED AS A WOODED BUFFER ZONE, <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE ELSE WISHED TO BE HEARD, THERE <br />WERE NONE. <br />!1R. REDICK INFORMED THE OARD THAT 'IR. BIDLINGMAYER MADE A <br />REQUEST FOR A BUFFER STRIP AT THE PLANNING 2, ZONING COMMISSION HEARING, <br />AND IT WAS POINTED OUT AT THAT TIME THAT A BUFFER 'MOULD BE REQUIRED AS <br />A PART OF THE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE. THE REQUEST FOR 53' WAS MADE, BUT <br />THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION INDICATED IN ITS OPINION THAT THE <br />REQUIREMENTS SET OUT IN THE ORDINANCE WOULD SUFFICE. <br />MRS. BIDLINGMAYER STATED THAT THEY WERE TOLD THE BUFFER STRIP <br />COULD BE GRASS, WHICH WOULD NOT DO THE JOB, AND THEY ;'COULD LIKE THIS <br />DEFINED. <br />MR. REDICK EXPLAINED THAT THE 19' BUFFER REQUIRED BY THE <br />ORDINANCE MUST SCREEN THE AREA WITHIN ONE YEAR FROM PLANTING AND SHOULD <br />BE A 6' HIGH SOLID HEDGE. <br />MRS. BIDLINGMAYER FELT THIS SHOULD BE MADE A PART OF -THE <br />PUBLIC RECORD, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT IT IS LAW NOW, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT THIS WOULD BE A PART <br />OF SITE PLAN REVIEW AND WOULD HAVE TO BE TAKEN CARE OF AT THE TIME OF <br />SITE PLAN REVIEW. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THERE IS AN EXISTING 25' DITCH <br />AND THE 25' ROAD AND THIS WOULD BE 10' ADDITIONAL FOR A HEDGE SO THERE <br />c If i i \11 <br />46 <br />T%,7,202 <br />