My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/1/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
11/1/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:09 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:44:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/01/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADDED THE EMERGENCY ITEM REnUESTED BY <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT TO TODAY'S AGENDA, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE, ATTORNEY COLLINS, <br />ATTORNEY CALDWELL, CITY COUNCILMAN DAVID GREGG, CITY sIANAGER JOHN <br />LITTLE, ATTORNEY CLEM AND !'MAYOR IOLAN OF INDIAN 'RIVER SHORES, AND <br />CITY ATTORNEY TOM PALMER MET IPJ HIS OFFICE LAST FRIDAY IN A !tIORKSHOP <br />SESSION TO DISCUSS THE BEST WAY TO GET THE FIRE DISTRICT OFF THE GROUND <br />AND MOVING. THERE ARE TWO REQUESTS WHICH HE WAS TO BRING BACK TO THE <br />BOARD. ONE WAS THAT WE APPOINT TWO MEMBERS TO A FIRE STUDY COMMITTEE <br />WITH THE IDEA THAT THE COMMITTEE MOULD CARRY FORWARD, IF A DISTRICT <br />IS CREATED, AND BECOME MEMBERS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PART OF THE FIRE <br />DISTRICT, THE OTHER WAS THAT A STUDY BE DONE TO DETERMINE !SHAT OUR <br />NEEDS ARE, WHAT WE PRESENTLY HAVE, AND THE DIRECTION WE WOULD GO !11THIN <br />THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT CONTINUED THAT THE Towi OF INDIAN RIVER <br />SHORES NOMINATED SUZANNEā¢BODEN, AND THE CITY OF VERO ,EACH WOULD BE <br />REPRESENTED BY lAYOR SCURLOCK AND DAVID GREGG, !iE ASKED THAT THE <br />BOARD APPOINT TiIO MEMBERS TO REPRESENT THE COUNTY AND STATED THAT HE <br />WOULD LIKE TO AGREE, IPJ PRINCIPLE, THAT THE COUNTY WOULD FUND A STUDY <br />AS REQUESTED BY THE MUNICIPALITIES. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THE <br />STUDY IS NEEDED BECAUSE THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME PARANOIA ABOUT WHO IS <br />GOING TO CONTROL WHAT AND WHERE EVERYTHING IS GOING, <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE AGREED WE SHOULD NOMINATE <br />TWO MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE, BUT HE MOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT <br />THE STUDY WOULD COST, <br />AFTER SOME DISCUSSION, IT WAS DECIDED THAT COMMISSIONER <br />SIEBERT AND CHAIRMAN ','!ODTKE WILL SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy CONCURRED THAT A STUDY IS IMPERATIVE IF <br />THE DISTRICT IS GOING TO BE SUCCESSFUL, BUT ALSO WISHED TO KNO!l WHAT <br />n <br />SUCH A STUDY WOULD COST, SHE FELT THE BOARD SHOULD BASICALLY SUPPORT <br />THE NEED FOR SUCH A STUDY AND THEN MOVE FORWARD TO DETERMINE A COST, <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY, IN CONJUNCTION <br />52 <br />NOV 1 1978 37 pu,-Z08 <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.