Laserfiche WebLink
WITH THE CHAIRMAN AND/OR COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, TO INVESTIGATE THE <br />ALTERNATIVES THAT ARE OPEN AND THE PROFESSIONALS THAT WOULD BE AVAILABLE <br />TO CONDUCT A FIRE DISTRICT STUDY. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ANNOUNCED THAT AT THIS TIME THE °OARD WILL <br />'REVIEW INFORMATION OBTAINED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING IN REGARD TO ITEM 9 <br />OF THE REVISION -TO THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. HE INFORMED THOSE <br />PRESENT THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS ENDED AND THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER <br />PUBLIC INPUT. THE CHAIRMAN NOTED THAT MUCH 'HAS BEEN SAID ABOUT THE <br />BOARD TAKING TIME TO MAKE A DECISION AND STATED THAT HE WOULD HOPE <br />THAT ANYONE SITTING ON THIS BOARD 11OULD ALWAYS 111AP1T TO MAKE CERTAIN <br />THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED WAS FACTUAL AND ACCURATE. THE CHAIRMAN <br />NOTED THAT THE LAND USE PLAN IS A PLAN FOR TIRE FUTURE OF THE COUNTY <br />AND HE FELT STRONGLY THAT THE FUTURE NEEDS OF THE SOUTi PEACH !'BILL <br />CALL FOR SOME -CLUSTER U14ITS, FOR MANY REASONS, PJCLUDING PRESERVING <br />OUR NATURAL RESOURCES BY MINIMIZING THE USE OF ''LATER FOR LAPIS, PROVIDING <br />MORE OPEN SPACE, LO14ERING COST OF DEVELOPMENT, ETC. THE CHAIRMA"I STATED <br />THAT HE IS, HOWEVER, OPPOSED TO THE COMMERCIAL Z09ING PROPOSED. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THE COUNTY IS FORTUNATE TO HAVE *DEVELOPERS SUCH <br />AS MR. PADGETT, BUT CONTINUED THAT HE BELIEVED THE ONLY IIAV THE REQUEST <br />TO BUILD 1110 UNITS WOULD BE IN LINE WOULD BE IF THE COUNTY AAD PLANNED <br />UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO INSURE ADEQUATE CONTROL OF SUCH A PROJECT, HE <br />FELT THAT THE REQUEST REALLY SHOWS THE NEED FOR PAD. UNDER '.•dHICH <br />THE COUNTY CAN REQUIRE PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED AS APPROVED REGARDLESS <br />.OF OWNERSHIP AND URGED THAT THE BOARD NOT MAKE A FINAL DECISION UNTIL <br />THE COUNTY CAN DEVELOP THE P.U.D. ORDINANCE ON WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN <br />WORKING. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT DURING THE LAST SIX DAYS <br />SINCE THE PUBLIC .HEARING, HE HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO TALK TO AT <br />LEAST ZS OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN THIS AREA, AND FELT AFTER SPENDING <br />A GREAT DEAL OF TIME TALKING WITH THEM, THAT BOTH HE AND THEY CAME <br />AWAY WITH A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT EACH OTHER'S GOALS WERE. <br />THE DIFFERENCE WAS ONLY IN APPROACH; THE GOALS ARE THE SAME, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DISCUSSED DENSITY, NOTING THAT THE TOTAL PROPOSED <br />PROJECT IS JUST SLIGHTLY OVER 3 UNITS PER ACRE, WHICH IS LESS THAN IS <br />53 <br />NOV 1 1978 <br />