Laserfiche WebLink
Vice Chair Bowman liked staffs recommendations of changing vesting at final plat. She <br />was, however concerned about the rationing issue and thought they needed to know the trips being <br />loaded. <br />Commissioner Davis wanted to get rid of the requirement. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan and Chairman Wheeler agreed with staff <br />Joseph Paladin asked for clarification as to whether it was with the exception of the <br />preliminary plat or being able to move forward (if the plat was in place). <br />Chairman Wheeler explained it was staffs recommendation to move forward. <br />George Christopher wanted to know why the Board was creating an exception when this <br />was the final plat and they were beginning to sell. He also wanted to know why they were getting <br />"fairer treatment" than the new guy. <br />Director Keating indicated it was an excellent point and explained there was a <br />trade-off—"do you increase the problem or try to make it fair for the person who started the <br />process with certain expectations". He expressed there was no right or wrong, no black or white <br />but an applicant who started the process can follow through on the same rules. <br />The Board and staff again discussed issues which included (1) sufficient preparation at <br />preliminary plat, (2) rationing, and (3) whether it should be a number or a percentage. <br />Chairman Wheeler gave an overview stating there were five (5) options: (1) 25%, (2) 15%, <br />(3) some number in between, (4) staffs recommendation of "no rationing" and (5) Mr. <br />January 5, 2007 11 <br />CHAPTER 910 <br />