Laserfiche WebLink
Assistant Attorney DeBraal suggested giving the proportionate share agreement a trial run <br />to see if it would help. <br />Gregg Burke, 1325 S. Village Square, did not think rationing, nor widening the roads was <br />the answer. He thought better planning would take more trips off the roads. <br />There was a brief discussion regarding risk, capacity, proportionate share agreements and <br />special impact fees. <br />Commissioner Davis suggested implementing a "concurrency suspension" which would <br />allow the proportionate share to kick -in or allow a buffer (with up to ten or twenty trips), since <br />Senate Bill 360 would not kick -in until later. <br />Andrew Bowler, President of Indian River Habitat for Humanity, expressed that it would <br />have a serious impact on affordable housing, so he wanted to see a "split" from when they got <br />vested to when they would actually pay. He suggested the Board ask themselves, "what impact <br />would this have on the affordable housing market" before moving ahead. <br />Chairman Wheeler remarked he would like to see this happen and Administrator Baird said <br />there was a legal way to give interest-free, economic, and incentive loans. Administrator Baird <br />thought this could be an option if the board voted on it. <br />Spencer Simmons, 6435 Tropical Way, asked the Board to remember the small builder, <br />not the deep -pocket builders and suggested re-evaluating the trips so capacity could be expanded <br />on the roads. <br />January 5, 2007 7 <br />CHAPTER 910 <br />