Laserfiche WebLink
Director Keating thought commercial development should be considered in concurrency. <br />He expressed that concurrency is to maintain the level of service, therefore it had to be reflected <br />and felt there needed to be a differentiation between trip and trip -end. <br />Commissioner Flescher commented that staff could not "blanket" commercial use because <br />it needed to be broken down. He suggested having another workshop. <br />Chairman Wheeler asked Director Keating if there were meetings scheduled regarding <br />impact fees and he replied that staff is currently collecting data and that it would be a couple <br />months before they had any products. <br />Bruce Barkett represented Antilles PD, and supported staff's recommendation as <br />proposed. He requested that Antilles (and other projects which have already achieved final plat <br />approval) be exempt or allowed to vest up to 25% of the balance of trips. <br />The Board indulged in a lengthy discussion with Director Keating and Mr. Barkett <br />regarding trips. <br />Richard Bialosky, 940 Oyster Shell Lane, agreed with staff but did not see a reason for the <br />rationing element. He said if there was going to be rationing, he wanted to let proportionate share <br />kick -in when rationing kicks -in so the rationing would not be a problem. He asked for <br />consideration to have a separate workshop to discuss issues regarding US1. <br />Commissioner Davis questioned Director Keating to see if proportionate share would work <br />and he replied that he would have to research it to see if there were any conflicts with State law. <br />January 5, 2007 6 <br />CHAPTER 910 <br />