Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED RESTUDYING JUST N0. 8 IN AREA 5, <br />AND MAKING A DECISION ON THE REST. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT A PORTION COULD BE DELETED FROM <br />WHATEVER MOTION IS MADE. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO VARIOUS ALTERNATIVES FOR <br />THE INTERSECTION AT THE CURVE. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE COULDN'T REALLY SEE ANY <br />PROBLEM WITH ACCEPTING THE ZONING BOARD'S ORIGINAL RECOMMENDATION AS AN <br />INTERIM STEP. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COM- <br />MISSIONER LYONS, THAT: <br />THE PROPERTY WHICH LIES 660' SOUTH AND EAST OF THE CENTER LINE <br />OF S.R. 512, LESS THE WEST 1320' AND LESS THE S'i. 1/4 OF THE <br />NE 1/4, AND THE PROPERTY WHICH LIES WITHIN 660' NORTH AND WEST <br />OF THE CENTER LINE OF S.R. 512, ALL LYING IN SECTION 23, TWP. <br />31S, RANGE 38E; AND <br />THAT PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TwP. 31S, <br />RANGE 38E,.LYING SOUTH AND EAST AND WITHIN 660' OF THE CENTER <br />LINE OF S.R. 512; <br />BE REZONED FROM C-1.COMMERCIAL TO A -AGRICULTURAL, <br />WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ARE GOING TO RESTUDY THE ENTIRE <br />INTERSECTION THERE AND POSSIBLY CHANGE SOME OF THAT PROPERTY BACK <br />TO A MORE INTENSE USE, THE REASONS FOR THE REZONING BEING TO REDUCE <br />e <br />THE TOTAL COMMERCIAL ACREAGE TO A FIGURE THAN CAN MORE REALISTICALLY <br />BE UTILIZED IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS CONSISTENT <br />WITH THE AREAS OUTLINED AS N0. 8 AND NO. 9 ON THE MAP <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE UNDERSTANDS WE ARE GOING <br />r� <br />TO COME BACK AND TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INTERSECTION OF 510 AND 512 AT <br />A LATER DATE, AND COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT WAS CORRECT. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />40 <br />NOV 2 11978 <br />F US �j PnF 365 <br />