Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Wheeler felt a need to be consistent and not set a precedent. <br />Commissioner Davis agreed. <br /> <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Davis, to deny waiving the <br />interest on the demolition lien. <br /> <br />Commissioner Neuberger disagreed. This property is in the Gifford area where <br />there is a shortage of affordable housing. He felt the Board could bend the rules in this case. <br />Mr. Lanier <br />said he wanted to place the house in the SHIP Program.He wanted the <br />Board to look at him as a catalyst for the County. <br />Commissioner Davis was not willing to waive the full amount. <br /> <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and the motion <br />passed 4-1, Commissioner Neuberger opposed. (The Board <br />directed staff to deny the waiver of interest on the <br />demolition lien requested by Mr. Lanier, as recommended <br />in the memorandum of November 4, 2005. <br /> <br />12.E. COUNTY ATTORNEY - SPECIAL ACT REQUIRING SUPER <br />MAJORITY VOTE TO EXPAND THE URBAN SERVICE <br />AREA BOUNDARY <br />Assistant County Attorney DeBraal said he was directed by Chairman Lowther to <br />find out if the Board could, via a Special Act, legally move the Urban Service Boundary by a super <br />majority vote, or a 4-1 vote. It is his opinion that they could do this. The advantage is that another <br />Commission could come in at a later date, and, by a vote of 3-2, change the idea of a super majority <br />November 15, 2005 28 <br /> <br />