My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/15/2005
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
11/15/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2018 2:21:18 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:00:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/15/2005
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3096
Book and Page
129, 859-908
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
265
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vote. The only downside is other municipalities who annex property would still be able to move <br />the urban service area by applying their own plans and land use schemes to the annexed property. <br />Commissioner Wheeler wanted to move for reconsideration of his proposal to change the <br />urban service area only by majority vote of the people. His primary concern is the County still has <br />to provide services while the property owners do not have to pay for these services. <br />Assistant County Attorney DeBraal said for further discussion this item would have to be a <br />motion by the prevailing party and that Commissioner Wheeler can bring it back at a later date <br />under his agenda items. <br /> <br />NO ACTION TAKEN. <br /> <br />12.F. COUNTY ATTORNEY - PERMISSION TO RETAIN <br />MEDIATOR TO RESOLVE DISPUTE CONCERNING THE <br />LAWTON PROPERTY <br />Assistant County Attorney DeBraal said when the County extended Indian River <br />Boulevard in the late 1980s they entered into an agreement with the Lawton family to provide <br />them a median and a curb cut to provide access to their property. The County also agreed to install <br />two steel casings under the boulevard to provide utilities to the property. The agreement was <br />amended in 1992 with a penalty clause stating if the County did not provide the required <br />improvements by November 24, 1994, a penalty equivalent to the daily accruing real estate taxes <br />on the property would be collectible from the County and payable to the Lawtons. The County did <br />not comply exactly as promised. Both parties have agreed to present the case to a mediator with <br />hope of resolving the outstanding issues out of court. Staff recommends the Board authorize the <br />expenditure of $2,000 to retain a state certified mediator; and authorize the Public Works Director <br />to be the designated representative to negotiate and recommend settlement offers to the Board. <br /> <br />November 15, 2005 29 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.