My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
11/16/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2022 12:24:20 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2966
Book and Page
127, 896-940
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
447
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Joseph Schulke, <br /> 1717 Indian River Blvd., was not in favor of a moratorium <br /> Tony Donadio, <br />1665 E. Rosewood Court, was not in favor of a moratorium <br />but he felt we need to implement a visioning process the right way and that takes time. <br /> Jerry Strom, <br />515 Greytwig Road, was not in favor of a moratorium. He felt it <br />put uncertainty into the process and since he has purchased property in this county he wanted to <br />know if this would stop the process. <br /> County Attorney Collins agreed that to some extent the applicants would be <br />proceeding at their own risk because of the time span involved before the moratorium ordinance <br />becomes effective. <br /> Lauren Connelly, <br />President of the Realtors Association, supported smart and <br />slow growth but cannot support no growth <br />Richard Bialosky <br /> , 940 Oyster Shell Lane, was not in favor of a moratorium <br />and suggested they reconsider Commissioner Davis’ idea of excluding pipeline projects. <br />Rene Renzi, <br /> 301 Waverly Place, spoke in favor of the moratorium saying that <br />it won’t hurt people instead it might work in their favor. <br /> Discussion continued regarding the process of a pre-application. <br /> Scott Sanders, <br />1196 Indian River Drive, was opposed to a moratorium. He <br />told the Board they are trying to control the type of people who move into this county, not control <br />growth. He said they are taking landowners constitutional rights away and it is going to bring <br />about a ton of lawsuits. <br />Keith Pelan, <br /> Kimley-Horn & Associates, said the imposition they are putting <br />on the developer is going to hurt his business and they will be hesitant to sign contracts with his <br />firm. <br /> Thomas Barnes Jr <br />., 602 Tulip Lane, spoke in opposition to a moratorium. <br /> <br /> After discussion, Commissioner Lowther rescinded his second to the motion <br />and noted that this is a big issue. <br />NOVEMBER 16, 2004 33 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.