My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/02/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
11/02/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2022 3:32:09 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC / ECB / SWDD
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/02/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2966
Book and Page
127, 788-851
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
445
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />the basis of fairness. He preferred to have RS-3, the original recommendation. He stressed that he <br />is not a developer and would want RS-6 or more if he were the developer. <br />Commissioner Adams explained that staff was looking for a compromise to make it <br />work for the County and Mr. Mixell. <br />Mr. Mixell <br /> pointed out that he might not be able to continue his agricultural <br />exemption and there are a lot of other things involved. He thought the Board should be able to <br />break out one acre from the property. <br />In response to Commissioner Macht, Director Keating explained why this one <br />less-than-5-acre-lot could not be separated from the rest of the property. <br />Rick Capellen <br />advised that he, his wife and son have lived in the home leased from <br />Mr. Mixell for about three years. He asked the Commission to grant the change so he can purchase <br />the home on one acre. He asked the Commissioners to take into consideration that Mr. Mixell is <br />just trying to uphold his end of the deal they had made. <br />Commissioner Lowther understood that under the existing use, 7 single-family units <br />would be allowed and if the property is rezoned to RS-3, 109 units would be allowed and that is a <br />lot of units. <br />Joseph Paladin <br />, a developer, Atlantic Coast Construction and Development, <br />advised that he had this property under contract, but decided it was not a good idea to develop at <br />that time because of the many things needed to make it happen. One of the deterrents was the <br />testing on the Kerr Farm. The deal was not doable unless that property could be combined with the <br />Mixell property. He described Mr. Mixell as “the most honorable man” he had ever dealt with and <br />he was sure Mr. Mixell would live up to a break-out of the lot if that could be done. He thought <br />that because of the proximity to the Kerr Farms and all the other issues involved with possibly <br />developing that area, it would not happen for 3-5 years down the road. He supported Mr. Mixell’s <br />request for rezoning and thought it was good for that location. <br />John Williams, <br /> Smuggler’s Cove, suggested the Board direct staff to find a way to <br />break out the one acre. <br />November 2, 2004 <br />14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.