My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/02/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
11/02/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2022 3:32:09 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC / ECB / SWDD
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/02/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2966
Book and Page
127, 788-851
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
445
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Chairman Ginn then reviewed #80 having to do with height limitations. They <br />agreed with Commissioner Macht to limit height restrictions to structures designed for human <br />habitation (exempting radio repeater towers and the like). <br />After a brief discussion, the Board affirmed all under General and affirmed #80 with <br />respect to structures designed for human habitation having a height limitation. <br />Chairman Ginn then continued on page 357 Landscaping/Buffering, and reviewed <br />#15, 26, and 49. <br />Commissioners affirmed the Landscaping/Buffering recommendations. <br />Next, Chairman Ginn reviewed the items under Density, recommendations #24, <br />#25, #30, and #33. She mentioned her addition of “affordable housing” to #33 although she did <br />not know how it could be done. Under #30, Commissioner Adams did not want to see townhouses <br />eliminated. <br />Chairman Ginn thought that the recommendations under Density should go through <br />the visioning process because they were more “big picture”. <br />Commissioner Macht believed we need to be careful about the densities that we do <br />not make it impossible for people to purchase a good starter home. <br />Donna Keys <br />, a member of the GTF, thought that what the GTF wanted to do is <br />eliminate the small lot subdivision process. That process does not allow Planning & Zoning to <br />make any changes. But, if it comes through as PD (planned development), P & Z can make <br />changes. <br />Director Boling explained how the process had come about and some of the options <br />that could be considered. <br />Discussion ensued. <br />The Board affirmed their desire to have small lot subdivisions go through the PD <br />process. <br />th <br />Tim Zorc <br />, 4415 5 Place SW, explained that the small lot subdivision process was <br />State Housing Initiatives Partnership <br />created when the SHIP () program guidelines were written <br />and we were thinking of ways to reduce and streamline affordable housing to make it a little bit <br />November 2, 2004 <br />35 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.