Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REFERRED TO THE DUAL TAXATION STUDY AND <br />NOTED THE SHERIFF IS SERVICING THE MUNICIPALITIES AS WELL AS THE UNINCOR- <br />PORATED AREAS SO POSSIBLY THE MONEY SHOULD BE TAKEN OUT OF THE CONTINGENCY <br />FUND INSTEAD OF REVENUE SHARING. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE COMMISSION MIGHT WANT TO <br />CONSIDER TAKING FUNDS OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY FELT WE SHOULD ADHERE TO OUR POLICY THIS <br />TIME AND CONSIDER CHANGING IT LATER. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, <br />THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE.FINANCIAL OFFICER TO PAY THE <br />$14,718 REQUESTED BY THE SHERIFF OUT OF FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING AND <br />APPROVED THE FOLLOWING BUDGET AMENDMENT: <br />COUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No. CREASE DECREASE <br />EQUIPMENT 62-3101-402.99 $14,718 <br />RESERVE FOR <br />CONTINGENCIES 62-990-701.00 $14,718 <br />I <br />SHERIFF .JOYCE THEN DISCUSSED HIS REQUEST FOR AN ADDITIONAL <br />ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER. HE STATED THAT WE NOW HAVE ONLY ONE MAN COVERING <br />i <br />500 SQ. MILES FOR ANIMAL CONTROLPAND SINCE WE HAVE TAKEN ON ADDITIONAL <br />AREAS TO POLICE, ANOTHER WARDEN IS NEEDED FOR THE REMAINING NINE MONTHS <br />OF THE YEAR. HE STATED AT THE END OF NINE MONTHS THE SALARY FOR THE <br />ADDITIONAL WARDEN, INCLUDING EVERYTHING, WOULD BE $7,815.51. SHERIFF <br />JOYCE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE REQUESTED THE CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW <br />• HIM TO HAVE THEIR ANIMAL CONTROL VEHICLE FOR $1.00 A YEAR SINCE THEY <br />WOULD NO LONGER BE USING IT. HE RECEIVED APPROVAL AND NOW HAS IT IN <br />OPERATION. HE NOTED THAT THE COUNTY IS NOT ENFORCING THE CITY'S LEASH <br />LAW, JUST THE ANIMAL CONTROL LAW. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED -OUT THAT WHEN THE CITY OF VERO <br />BEACH DECIDED THEY NO LONGER WANTED TO BE IN THE ANIMAL CONTROL BUSINESS, <br />WE SAID WE WERE WILLING TO TAKE IT OVER, BUT THAT WE COULD ONLY DO IT <br />UNDER*THE BUDGETARY RESTRAINTS WE ARE FACED WITH AND IF THEY WERE WILLING <br />TO ACCEPT THE LEVEL OF SERVICE THE COUNTY COULD PROVIDE. HE NOTED THAT* <br />THE SHERIFF IS NOW SAYING THE SERVICE IS NOT ADEQUATE, WHICH IS EXACTLY <br />WHAT WE SAID AT THAT TIME. <br />5 <br />DEC 2 0 1978 <br />ava 38 fncl.1007 <br />