12/13/2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board on October 4, 2005. He opined that the County lawfully did not adopt a “pending ordinance doctrine” and failed to comply with current lawfully adopted ordinances at the time the Antilles application was submitted. Further, a pending ordinance in Florida has been applied to decisions regarding zoning of property and this application is regarding vesting concurrency. He said his client’s intent is not to tie up concurrency for several years which has been a concern to the Board. He already has an approved recorded final plat and currently the project is under construction. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED by Chairman Lowther for discussion, to approve the Antilles Subdivision exemption from the pending ordinance invoked by the Board and to approve sending this item back to the Professional Advisory Committee for further review. Chairman Lowther commented that this issue came up at the end of the October 4, 2005 meeting. He suggested bringing forward to the beginning of the meeting under Item 4 Commissioners’ items. He acknowledged that the Board acted inappropriately by taking action on October 4, 2005 without holding a public hearing. There was a lengthy discussion regarding the percentage of completed underground work, completed roads and curbs on the Antilles Subdivision project. Joseph Paladin, Atlantic Coast Construction, handed out three (3) sets of photos of development at Parkland Estates, Paladin Place II, and Antilles (copy on file) to present the best scenario to complete developments. He stated, the intent of the Board, on October 4, 2005, was to keep people from drawing concurrency far in advance of building, and to give the longest length of time for people who actually needed the building permits the best chance possible to pull a permit to build their home. He did not want the Board to reverse the pending ordinance because it is December 13, 2005 29