Laserfiche WebLink
effective in allowing the availability of concurrency and the ability to pull a building permit by <br />anyone. <br />Commissioner Davis posed several questions to staff regarding the number of <br />, <br />non-vested capacity on US Hwy 1. Traffic Engineer Chris Mora responded 11 trips are speculated <br />to be left available. Antilles would need more than 11 trips in order to vest. <br /> <br />Attorney Barkett <br /> tried to bring the discussion back to the issue before them. <br /> <br />Chairman Lowther read the motion and comments of Attorney Collins from the <br />minutes of the October 4, 2005 meeting, Item 13.D.1. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued and the Commissioners argued their reasons that lead them to <br />invoke the “pending ordinance.” Commissioner Davis agreed with Mr. Barkett that proposing <br />ordinance changes through a “pending ordinance” is not always prudent. He felt if they had not <br />invoked the pending ordinance on that day, people would have been hurt by not being able to pull <br />a building permit. <br /> <br />Joseph Paladin <br /> reiterated the pending ordinance is the safest way to make sure that <br />everybody has a fair chance of vesting until the Board finds a solution. He did not see anything <br />preventing Attorney Barkett’s client from obtaining the building permits he needed, but he <br />seriously doubted that the subdivision would be completed in a year. <br />Attorney Barkett <br />At the request of Commissioner Neuberger, responded to Mr. <br />Paladin’s comments, agreeing he can apply for 80 building permits of sold lots; not for the unsold <br />lots. He felt it was advantageous to vest now because of the possibility that concurrency may not <br />be available next year. <br />Commissioner Neuberger stated that if he buys out all of concurrency then he is <br />preventing someone else from getting a building permit and that is a major concern to the Board. <br />December 13, 2005 30 <br /> <br />