Laserfiche WebLink
HOSPITAL SERVICE OVER, THE ALLOCATION WILL COME BACK. THE CHAIRMAN <br />POINTED OUT THAT WE ALSO NEED TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY AREAS PREVIOUSLY <br />SERVICED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, SUCH AS THE BAPTIST RETIREMENT <br />CENTER, ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE 1.39 MILLION SEWAGE ALLOCATION FIGURE. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT IN THE MEMO FROM CITY ENGINEER <br />LLOYD, HE TAKES ALL THOSE AND'APPLIES THEM AGAINST THE COUNTY'S ALLOCATION. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE FELT WE MUST KEEP PLUGGING <br />UNTIL WE GET THIS SETTLED. HE WISHED TO KNOW IF THE BOARD WOULD BE <br />WILLING TO GIVE THE ALLOCATION TO THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES WITH <br />THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IF THE TOWN SHOULD GO OFF THE CITY SERVICE,'THE <br />ALLOCATION CAN BE USED SOME PLACE ELSE. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO <br />GET THIS QUESTION RESOLVED AND GET THE NUMBERS STRAIGHT. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT WE DO NOT KNOW HOW LONG IT WILL <br />TAKE TO GET THE 201 STUDY BACK, BUT IF PLAN I IS APPROVED, THEN WE <br />KNOW WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO SERVICE THAT AREA. HE CONTINUED THAT IF <br />PLAN I IS APPROVED, HE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF FUNDS ARE GOING TO BE <br />MADE AVAILABLE TO THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT -HE DOES NOT FEEL WE ARE <br />HOLDING UP THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES BECAUSE THEY CAN'T PROCEED <br />UNTIL WE HAVE AN APPROVED 201 FACILITY PLAN UNLESS THEY WANT TO FOOT THE <br />WHOLE BILL THEMSELVES. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THEY MIGHT POSSIBLY WANT TO DO THAT <br />AND POINTED OUT THAT NO MATTER HOW THE LINE IS FINANCED, THE CITY OF <br />i <br />VERO BEACH WOULDN'T CONNECT IT UNLESS THE COMMITMENT ON THE COUNTY <br />ALLOCATION WERE AVAILABLE SO HE FELT THE FIRST STEP IS TO GET THE ALLOCA- <br />TION QUESTION SETTLED. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAS NO PROBLEM IN SAYING THAT <br />IF PLAN I IS THE ONE -WE HAVE TO LIVE WITH, WE WOULD GIVE THE ALLOCATION, <br />PROVIDING IT IS TRANSFERABLE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS TALKED TO CITY <br />ATTORNEY TOM PALMER, AND HE DOESN'T HAVE THE RETIREMENT CENTER INFORMA- <br />TION COMPLETE YET IN REGARD TO THE SQUARING -OFF. THE ATTORNEY NOTED <br />THAT THIS IS DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE SQUARING OFF, AND WE DO NOT KNOW <br />WHICH WAY IT GOES AS FAR AS THE ALLOCATION IS INVOLVED. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT IT COULD BE ARGUED THAT THE CENTER WAS <br />BEING SERVED PRIOR TO THE SEWER PLANT EXPANSION. <br />53 <br />Boos 38 PAGE 493 <br />JAN 24 1979 <br />