Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNER REDICK STATED THAT THEY HAVE THINGS OF THAT NATURE THAT <br />ARE BEING PROPOSED IN THE MASTER PLAN. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO SAN SEBASTIAN <br />SPRINGS SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO THE PLAT SHOWING THAT THERE WILL'BE'NO <br />FILL PLACED BELOW THE 5' FLOOD ELEVATION LEVEL AND SUBJECT TO FOLLOWING <br />THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE S RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO SEDIMENTATION. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS DISCUSSED THE 201 STUDY. HE NOTED THAT <br />THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES NEEDS HELP ON SEWAGE, AND HE FELT THE <br />CITY OF VERO.BEACH IS WILLING TO ACCEPT THEIR SEWAGE IF THEY CAN GET <br />THE NECESSARY ALLOCATION FROM THE COUNTY. HE CONTINUED THAT HE WOULD <br />LIKE TO TRY TO MOVE THIS SITUATION ALONG AND WOULD HOPE WE CAN GET TO <br />A POINT WHERE WE CAN FIGURE ON GIVING INDIAN RIVER SHORES THE ALLOCATION <br />SO THAT THEIR PROBLEM*CAN BE SOLVED. COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT <br />HE REALIZES THAT PART OF THIS WILL DEPEND ON WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE 201 <br />PLAN, BUT NOTED THAT IT SEEMS QUITE LIKELY THAT WE WILL END UP WITH AT <br />LEAST TWO SEWER TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE COUNTY. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT THERE SEEMS TO BE A LOT <br />OF DISAGREEMENT ABOUT HOW MUCH ALLOCATION THE COUNTY ACTUALLY HAS, AND <br />THIS MUST BE CLEARED UP. HE ALSO FELT WE MUST DETERMINE WHAT WOULD <br />HAPPEN TO THIS ALLOCATION IF WE SHOULD CHOOSE TO SERVICE INDIAN RIVER <br />SHORES FROM A DIFFERENT SEWER PLANT AT A LATER DATE. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT WE SHOULD GET THE PARTIES TOGETHER <br />AND TRY TO REACH SOME COMPROMISE AGREEMENT. IT WAS HIS OPINION THAT <br />THE ALLOCATION BELONGS TO THE COUNTY AND THAT THERE WOULD BE NO PROBLEM <br />IF THE COUNTY SHOULD CHOOSE TO USE IT TO SERVE INDIAN RIVER SHORES TEMPO- <br />RARILY AND THEN LATER, WHEN THEY GET INTO THE SEWER BUSINESS, -TRANSFER <br />IT SOMEWHERE ELSE, <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ALSO FELT THAT IT SEEMS PROBABLE THE REPORT <br />SUBMITTED ON THE 201 STUDY BY THE TAC COMMITTEE WILL BE ACCEPTED, BUT <br />FELT THERE ARE AREAS THAT WILL HAVE TO BE SPELLED OUT IN WRITING. HE <br />NOTED THAT WE NEED TO CHECK WITH THE CITY BECAUSE A STATEMENT HAS BEEN <br />MADE IN CONNECTION WITH A MEMO FROM CITY MANAGER LITTLE THAT THERE <br />HAVE BEEN "IRREVOCABLE ALLOCATIONS MADE BY THE COUNTY," WHICH DOES NOT <br />SEEM TO AGREE WITH THEIR ENGINEER S STATEMENT THAT IF'WE TAKE THE <br />52 <br />BoK <br />JAN 2 41979 PAGE <br />49 <br />