My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
1/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:57:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AT THAT POINT FROM AN EXISTING BORROW PIT. MR. LUETHJE STATED THAT WHEN <br />THE NEXT PHASE IS DEVELOPED, THEY PLAN TO FILE ANOTHER UTILITY AND <br />DRAINAGE EASEMENT PLAT WHICH WILL PROBABLY COVER THE ENTIRE SUBDIVISION. <br />HE CONTINUED THAT MR. MAGUIRE ACTUALLY HAS PURCHASED ALL OF THE LAND, <br />BUT MRS. WALKER, WHO HAS HER HOME THERE, WILL BE ALLOWED TO STAY UNTIL <br />IT IS DEVELOPED. MR. LUETHJE NOTED THAT THE ROADS ARE DEDICATED AND <br />WILL BE CURBED AND GUTTERED. THEY ARE CULVERTING THE DRAINAGE ON THE <br />REAR LOT LINE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED WHAT THE REASON WAS FOR NOT REPLATT_ING, <br />AND MR. LUETHJE EXPLAINED THAT IF THEY DID, THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO TO <br />1/2 ACRE LOTS, BUT NOW THEY ARE GRANDFATHERED IN. BY FILING ANOTHER PLAT, <br />THEY ARE JUST ADDING THE SERVICES TO IT, WHICH DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THE BOARD SHOULD MAKE SOME AGREEMENT <br />WITH THE DEVELOPER FOR THE ROADS TO BE PUT IN ACCORDING TO SUBDIVISION <br />REQUIREMENTS. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT THIS HAS BEEN DISCUSSED <br />AND IS TO BE DONE, BUT AN AGREEMENT WOULD BE FINE. $INCE THIS IS AN OLD <br />PLATTED SUBDIVISION, NO DRAINAGE WAS SHOWN, AND THEY ARE JUST PLANNING <br />TO UPGRADE THE OLD SUBDIVISION, USING THE SAME LAYOUT. <br />MR. LUETHJE COMMENTED THAT THE ROADS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO j <br />COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND THERE IS A CONTRACT ON THEM, HE STATED THEY <br />WOULD LIKE TO FINALIZE THIS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS RECOMMENDED THAT THE ROADS BE BUILT <br />' JUST AS THEY HAVE THEM DESIGNED, BUT EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE COUNTY <br />HAVING ASSURANCE THAT THE ROADS WILL BE PAVED ACCORDING TO COUNTY REQUIRE- <br />MENTS BEFORE THEY PROCEED TO SELL THE LOTS, HE'SUGGESTED FILING A <br />PERFORMANCE BOND. <br />MR. LUETHJE STATED HE COULD NOT ANSWER WHETHER HIS CLIENT WOULD <br />FURNISH A BOND, AND NOTED THAT HIS CLIENT'S ATTORNEY STATED THAT LEGALLY <br />.�� THE LOTS COULD BE SOLD RIGHT NOW AS THIS IS A RECORDED SUBDIVISION. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS AGREED THEY COULD, BUT FELT ANYBODY <br />BUYING THESE LOTS WOULD HAVE TROUBLE GETTING A BUILDING PERMIT. HE <br />AGAIN EXPRESSED CONCERN AS TO WHAT ASSURANCE THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE THAT <br />MR. LUETHJE'S CLIENT WOULD COMPLETE THE IMPROVEMENTS IN EACH UNIT. <br />E <br />JAN 2 41979 Nk PAX40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.