My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/15/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
12/15/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2018 10:54:17 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:19:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/15/2008
Meeting Body
City of Fellsmere
City of Sebastian
City of Vero Beach
Town of Orchid
Town of Indian River Shores
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4024
Book and Page
136, 341-369
Subject
Interlocal Service Boundary Area
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7264
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />Commissioner Davis, speaking directly to Director Keating, suggested <br />staff look at the practicality or impracticality of what that does to the future growth <br />patterns of the County. <br />Mayor Dunlop asked Mr. Minner if Sebastian had a problem with Citrus <br />Island, and they did not. He asked Fellsmere and the County if they could live with <br />Exhibit `F' being whatever DCA requires. <br />Mr. Nunemaker thought it was workable and Director Keating said yes, <br />if it could be incorporated within the document. Mayor Adams said that would be <br />workable. <br />Director Keating, explaining how DCA comments would be incorporated, <br />said they need to take the criteria out of those amendments and incorporate them with <br />Exhibit V. It was not simply going with what DCA says, because they would be <br />approving a whole document; it was gleaning what the principles and criteria are from <br />what DCA approved. <br />There were no objections to the incorporation of the new language <br />suggested by Sebastian's Attorney. <br />Mr. Nunemaker stated for the record that they are in full compliance with <br />the Stipulated Settlement; they have met their part of the bargain; and they have <br />transmitted the Ag Amendment, so that should not be an issue for them. <br />Mayor Dunlop brought up the issue of unanimous versus non -unanimous <br />vote, which he felt they needed to resolve. <br />14 <br />December 15, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.