Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />Attorney Vitunac reminded Mayor Dunlop that they have the issues of <br />Exhibits D, E, & F, coming before USAC in an advisory capacity; and they have <br />discussed that all projects coming in under the exceptions should at least get a review by <br />USAC. He suggested the working group meet again after the holidays to discuss all the <br />issues brought forward today. <br />Commissioner Wheeler thinks Section 15 (B) 1, 2 & 3 — the "Poison <br />Pill"- needed to be resolved, as well. <br />Mr. McGarry talked about the use of USAC for review purposes; and Mr. <br />Dunlop believed USAC is great for review because they are all working together in this <br />County. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan reminded that they need to resolve the issue of <br />Sebastian's Point -to -Point contiguity; talked about New Towns where they are allowing <br />2/ units per acre on the gross density, and asked if there was any way they could require <br />1/ unit per acre to come from the Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs). He thought it <br />was important because if they are going to limit it to only 2/ units west of I-95, that the <br />only way some other landowners may get value is if they can sell their development <br />rights. He thought maybe they could just say a maximum of 2/ units per acre. <br />Director Keating said currently Exhibit `E' is just a maximum, and the <br />County's New Town allowance does not allow 2/ units per acres; therefore, the maximum <br />allowance could be modified, as long as they are under the maximum that are stipulated. <br />He responded to further questions from Commissioner O'Bryan regarding the Sebastian <br />parcel to be developed as part of the WEC; how they would make the 500 acres satisfy <br />the WEC requirement and have a viable plan; and how they were going to pull together a <br />contiguous Employment Center in the whole design area, when they are that scattered. <br />15 <br />December 15, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />