Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />Mr. Minner inputted that it was because there are stronger restriction <br />levels that require that as you go into development you get your "x of residential", but <br />then you can't get anymore until you move forward into other areas. He said, looking at <br />the minimum of the 500 acres, the bigger we get in there, the less the jagged edges and <br />the enclave issues, and the more we annex, the less of a problem that is. As the gaps are <br />filled in, there will be less service issues, and less annexation issues. He said, looking at <br />some of the issues Fellsmere had with annexation, the County did not have those issues <br />five years ago, and Fellsmere did that annexing. He said Sebastian is looking to do better <br />development under restricted guidelines, and hoped the City would be given the <br />opportunity to develop the way the Developer proposes. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan believed the mistake was made not to challenge <br />Fellsmere's Point -to -Point annexations; and did not believe they should continue and <br />make more mistakes going forward. <br />Mr. Minner, Commissioners O'Bryan and Davis, and County staff <br />engaged in further discussion on the subject. Commissioner O'Bryan did not have a <br />problem with Point -to -Point as long as it was contiguous. <br />Attorney Glenn, speaking on the issue of enclaves, wanted to ensure there <br />were no blanket exemptions from Chapter 171, Part 1. <br />Mayor Dunlop thought the language at page 14, subsection 3, of the <br />Agreement should be clearer and should read, "The passage of a bill by either House of <br />the Sta4e of Fir-id legis'atffe or Senate to ..." Regarding subsection 1, "... charter <br />commission...", Mayor Dunlop did not think they should abandon the ISBA while <br />Charter is being studied. <br />16 <br />December 15, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />