Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />a unanimous consent by all six bodies; it does not mean a unanimous support in each of <br />the six bodies. He suggested they put in parenthesis what "unanimous" means. <br />Panel discussion continued regarding the meaning of "unanimous" and <br />when it is required. <br />Mr. Nunemaker remarked that that after the initiation, Fellsmere acted as <br />the gatekeeper for this Agreement and they have probably incurred about $30,000 in cost <br />associated with it. This they did that in a good faith effort to move the Agreement along. <br />He suggested, that if the movement was going to be delayed, his Council might require <br />that cost sharing be looked at, where another city take ownership as the gatekeeper of the <br />document and make the necessary revisions. <br />Mr. Nunemaker offered that they would take back Exhibit `F'; revise it; <br />and take it to Council with some finer resolution; noting that it was not meant to <br />incorporate in total what comes back from DCA. He thought it would be helpful to have <br />an ongoing staff working group as discussed prior. <br />Mayor Gillmor believed there was a lot of accord and that they are close; <br />and they need to have staff come back with a revised document. He thought that when <br />they meet next they could have a document on which they could all vote. <br />Mr. Vitunac wanted to call a meeting of the staff working group, in early <br />January, to revise the document according to tonight's comments and recommendations, <br />and for staff to come up with its recommendation for the Panel. Sebastian desired to hear <br />from the Planners. Vero Beach said they could meet by January 15, 2009. <br />22 <br />December 15, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />