Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />Mayor Adams asked for a consensus for the joint group to meet by <br />February 15, 2009. It was pointed out that they might have to wait until after comments <br />are received from DCA. <br />Mr. Nunemaker recommended to Council that they do not meet in the <br />interim if they wanted to wait and hear from DCA, so they do not run up unnecessary <br />bills. <br />Mayor Coy thinks they do need to wait until they hear from DCA, because <br />of past experience with submittals and what comes back. <br />Mayor Adams was agreeable to waiting to hear from DCA; and also <br />suggested that there was no point for the staff working group to meet prior to that, <br />because the main issue for everyone was Exhibit `F' <br />Mr. Minner had six issues for which he wanted confirmation: the <br />Sebastian contiguity, Fellsmere's Exhibit `F', the poison pill, Home Rule, the rewrite for <br />the extension language, and the New Town. He thought it was important that they meet <br />in the first week in January. It was suggested they meet in March. <br />Commissioner Wheeler asked Mr. Nunemaker to clarify what he meant <br />by gatekeeper and the $30,000 in cost sharing. <br />Mr. Nunemaker said it had become cumbersome for multiple iterations of <br />the document to be floating around, so Fellsmere took ownership of the document, and <br />their City Attorney has been doing all the edits, which is a time-consuming process. He <br />submitted that if Sebastian or one of the other municipalities wants to take ownership of <br />the document, they have no objection. <br />23 <br />December 15, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />