Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />Attorney Vitunac acknowledged and commended staff on how well they <br />have all worked together on the document, with Fellsmere doing the yeoman's job on the <br />changes. But thought, that with the document so far along, maybe Vero Beach could take <br />it over, and do the copying and other costs. <br />6. PUBLIC INPUT <br />Honey Minuse, Indian River Neighborhood Association, said they are very <br />impressed with the process that is going through, and felt strongly about USAC being in <br />an advisory capacity, requiring a review before those comprehensive plan changes. She <br />recommended and asked the Board to consider that when New Towns are being <br />considered, that the anchor tenant should be identified and contracted with prior to any <br />adoption being granted. They feel it would assure the commercial/ industrial aspects of <br />the New Towns, and would ensure some economic vitality. They also feel that when that <br />tenant is identified, that it will enhance the marketing effects of the residential <br />components. <br />Mike Gray, Vero Beach, who represents and works with the Graves <br />family, thought it was important that everyone understood that this document has a lot of <br />intentions, a lot of good efforts and hard work in it, but if it has ambiguities, it can cause <br />the document to be read in a number of different ways. He challenged everyone, during <br />the waiting period between meetings, to work through the rest of the issues and points <br />raised today. He thought the issue of "unanimous decision" was important and <br />suggested each municipality think about changes they would like to see in their <br />municipality for which they would require a unanimous decision, and see how that plays <br />out with the document, because once approved, it cannot be modified. <br />24 <br />December 15, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />