Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />Mr. Vitunac said Mr. Gray's comments were not quite accurate, because <br />you would have a unanimous approval requirement only if you are changing the <br />Comprehensive Plan for land outside the USA, which is a major difference. He stated <br />that is the whole point of this Agreement, and annexing land within the USA and in the <br />reserve area does not require unanimous approval, and even though some of the large <br />scale annexations would be reviewed by USAC, they are advisory reviews only. <br />Mayor Gillmor understood the document also provides for review after <br />five years, and if changes needed to be made in the future there would be allowances for <br />that, because the document is not cast in stone for twenty years. <br />Joseph Paladin, President of Black Swan Consulting, commenting on the <br />"unanimous" decision, suggested they allow for one vote to not stop the whole process, <br />because two or three give more credibility. <br />There were no other speakers. <br />7. ELECTED OFFICIAL DISCUSSION ON CONSENSUS <br />FOR DIRECTION TO ISBA WORKING GROUP <br />Mayor Gillmor summed up the consensus of the Group that they would <br />allow staff to meet sometime before the 15th of January; that they are all agreed that <br />sometime before March 15, 2009, the Joint Body would convene again and hopefully <br />have a document on which they could all vote. <br />25 <br />December 15, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />