Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />mentioned in this Agreement. They do not have a problem with Point -to -Point issues; <br />but do have a problem with Exhibit "F,,, which is Fellsmere's description of how it plans <br />to develop the 20,000 acres. Vero Beach's position is that the Department of Community <br />Affairs (DCA) is looking at the issue right now and will very likely come down with a <br />different set of regulations. <br />City Planner Tim McGarry knew Exhibit `F' was still going through the <br />process; that Sebastian and the County responded, and negative objections came down <br />from the State (DCA) on the planned amendment, and felt that one way to meet the <br />problems in Exhibit IF was for all participants to work together in resolving some of <br />these issues. <br />Attorney Vitunac, in response to Councilmember Simchick's comments <br />regarding water and sewer, believed that this Agreement will have all those issues <br />discussed under the USAC annexation reviews. They also believe Exhibits D, E & F (the <br />exceptions for Fellsmere, Sebastian and the County's New Towns) should all be taken to <br />USAC for comments; and it does not have to be mandatory action. It is their belief that <br />the review of USAC on all applications, using said Exhibits, should have some sort of <br />official review. Although that was not voted on by the Council, he believed it was <br />something they could support. <br />C. FELLSMERE <br />I. COMMENTS <br />City Manager Jason Nunemaker recalled how his staff has been working <br />on this Agreement since 2005, and briefly described the process that has brought them to <br />the present ISBA. He said their Council was ready to move forward and they are aware <br />31 <br />December 15, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />