Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />Mr. Minner, upon request, explained what the highlighted portions on the <br />map of Sebastian's Annexation Exception Proposal represent. <br />Councilmember Simchick mentioned the issues they have problems with: <br />traffic concurrency, water, Liberty Park, and the City of Sebastian not being on the traffic <br />concurrency. She thought that if the City spend a lot of money to go into the County's <br />concurrency maps, it would create a black hole in the Fellsmere area; and therefore <br />thought they could, maybe futuristically, discuss going with traffic concurrency as a <br />whole. <br />Councilmember Coy, speaking on New Town issues, said when ISBA <br />negotiations originally started, the language said New Towns would not be within 5 miles <br />of a current municipality, but that language has since changed. She was still of the <br />mindset that the 5 -mile limit is something Sebastian needed to do to protect its <br />boundaries; because building a New Town on top of a current town does not make a lot <br />of sense. She hoped they could negotiate, as a group, going back to the 5 -anile limit. <br />(Clerk's Note: County Administrator Joe Baird arrived at 5:22 p.m.) <br />B. VERO BEACH <br />1. COMMENTS <br />Charles Vitunac, City Attorney, thought Vero Beach had only two minor <br />items, one being Citrus Highway, and the other the Sebastian's Western Employment <br />Center (WEC). Vero Beach finds that the existence of that Highway has not yet been <br />determined and they would argue against it being built, and therefore do not want it <br />December 15, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />