My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/7/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
2/7/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:58:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/07/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT IF THE SUBDIVISION HAD BEEN ZONED <br />R-lE, THIS COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED, BUT THESE PARTICULAR SUBDIVISIONS <br />ARE IN R-1 ZONES WHERE YOU ARE ALLOWED TO BUILD ON A LOT WHICH HAS 7,000 <br />SQ. FT, AS LONG AS IT FRONTS ON A ROAD. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT IF YOU DIVIDE INTO MORE THAN <br />TWO LOTS, YOU COME UNDER THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED, BUT POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS NO <br />PROHIBITION IN THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ABOUT SLICING A PLATTED LOT <br />INTO TWO PARCELS. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THE ONLY REASON THIS HAS COME ABOUT <br />IS BECAUSE THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT HAS LOWERED THEIR REQUIREMENTS FOR A <br />SEPTIC TANK TO HALF AN ACRE. HE FELT THIS DIVIDING OF PLATTED LATS <br />COULD HAVE A VERY DETRIMENTAL AFFECT ON PROPERTY VALUES. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED AND NOTED THAT MOST OF THESE SUBDIVI- <br />SIONS WERE PLATTED IN ONE ACRE LOTS IN ORDER TO MEET HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br />REQUIREMENTS. HE CONTINUED THAT THE BOARD MUST ALSO TAKE INTO CONSIDERA- <br />TION THE OLD PLATS OF RECORD IN THE COUNTY THAT HAVE 25', 50' OR 75' <br />LOTS. PEOPLE FREQUENTLY BUY SEVERAL ADJACENT LOTS; COMBINE THEM; AND <br />THEN DIVIDE THEM INTO LOTS OF A SIZE THAT WILL COMPLY WITH ZONING RE- <br />QUIREMENTS. HE NOTED THESE PEOPLE MUST BE PROTECTED. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT WE COULD ACCOMPLISH OUR PURPOSE BY <br />SAYING YOU CAN'T REDUCE THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING AREA, BUT YOU CAN <br />INCREASE IT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT AT THIS STAGE HE -WOULD PREFER THE <br />BOARD REACHED A POLICY DECISION AND THEN HE COULD DRAFT SOMETHING. HE <br />FELT THE ANSWER IS TO GO BACK AND REZONE SOME OF THESE SUBDIVISIONS. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT BELIEVE <br />WE CAN RESOLVE THE PROBLEM TODAY, HE WOULD LIKE TO PUT A HOLD ON THE <br />. 1 <br />SITUATION UNTIL WE CAN ADDRESS THE PROBLEM PROPERLY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE BOARD CAN PASS AN EMERGENCY <br />ORDINANCE BY A UNANIMOUS VOTE OF ALL FOUR MEMBERS PRESENT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DISCUSSED A TIME FRAME, AND ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THIS WOULD REQUIRE A MORATORIUM. <br />56 <br />BOOK 39 PAGE 56 <br />'FEB 71979 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.