My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/16/2003 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
12/16/2003 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 11:36:03 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/16/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2574
Book and Page
126, 269-329
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
522
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
William Glynn agreed that this request should go back to staff to look at reducing the <br />density to a level that is acceptable. <br />John Williams said he would not speak on the next item but asked that his objections to <br />this item be repeated. He urged the Board to direct Attorney Collins to do more research and <br />suggested placing a moratorium on rezoning any agricultural lands until they get the <br />Comprehensive Plan in order. Non -compatibility of residential development with agricultural <br />land is a future problem that they will have to face. Future Commissioners are not going to be able <br />to stop development. He suggested purchasing property through a bond referendum or sales tax to <br />form a green belt outside the urban service line to protect agriculture, and make it clear that the <br />service line will not be extended in the future. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard with regard to this matter. There <br />being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br />Chairman Macht said the Board is well aware of the impact of growth and the necessity of <br />control. Personally he never understood why the Comprehensive Plan has such high densities on <br />the edge of the developmental property line which is having this adverse affect. Although he asked <br />for citizen input he believes their input needs to be more formal and comprehensive against the <br />backdrop of what the law says. He advised that our legal department has researched the Bert <br />Harris Act to see how challenges have been handled by the court, but there has not been significant <br />activity to know the outcome. He believed the Board was not afraid of the Bert Harris Act because <br />the effect of a ruling adverse to County interest would not be that disastrous. <br />Chairman Macht stated he has asked Planning and Legal staff if the County is compelled <br />by law to move the urban service area line and the answer has been "no". There is nothing that will <br />force this Board to move that line. He emphatically recommended that the urban service area line <br />never, ever be moved and asked Director Boling to indicate where the line is to put things in a <br />greater perspective for the citizens. <br />DECEMBER 16, 2003 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.