My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/16/2003 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
12/16/2003 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 11:36:03 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/16/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2574
Book and Page
126, 269-329
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
522
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
build anything that meets the criteria of the rezoning. He cautioned the Board that first they are <br />rezoning to RM -8, and, even though they are voting to approve the special exception use and the <br />rezoning there is no requirement that the special exception use be built. <br />There was a brief question and answer period and the Board learned that there are no <br />contingencies on the rezoning and the property is totally immersed with RM -8 zoning. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this public hearing. There <br />was none. The Chairman closed the public hearing. <br />space. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Neuberger, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Lowther, to approve staff's <br />recommendation. <br />Discussion continued. <br />Commissioner Ginn said in the future she would like to see requirements for open green <br />Director Boling said at least 70% of the required open space has to be green. They do not <br />consider green space, but they do consider open space. <br />Chairman Macht commented that it was time to review those regulations. <br />Commissioner Ginn agreed. <br />In reply to Commissioner Neuberger questioning the negative votes of the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission (4-2), Director Boling guessed that it was a traffic issue. He believed one of <br />the negative votes was not to add an access to Indian River Boulevard. <br />Discussion continued regarding access to Indian River Boulevard. In this case, there is a <br />separate owner of the ALF from the owner of the duplex and the duplex owner did not want access <br />at 41" Street because they did not want the ALF going through their residential area. Comments <br />were made that eventually there will be nothing but driveways onto Indian River Boulevard, and <br />DECEMBER 16, 2003 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.