My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/19/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
12/19/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/2/2018 11:40:16 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:26:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Mining
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/19/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4024
Book and Page
136, 442-484
Subject
Amendments to Mining Regulations in LDR Chapters 911, 934, and 971
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8823
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOTION WAS MADE BY Commissioner Solari, <br />SECONDED by Vice Chairman Flescher, to reconfigure <br />Section #4, Item (4)(e)(1), and to insert a subcategory (a) for <br />the minimum gradable base of twelve (12) inches of suitable <br />road base material, and a subcategory (b) for the twelve -inch <br />sub base and twelve (12) inches of coquina road base; and to <br />tie those requirements into Section 4(f), with an increase in <br />the paving trip threshold to 1,000 trips. <br />Staff provided technical information on how the increased road materials would <br />increase the load-bearing ratio (LBR) of the haul route and the number of truck trip ends. <br />Ms. McGuire -Smith voiced concerns regarding the 1,000 truck trip threshold, and <br />urged the Board to keep the truck trips down to 500. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan also objected to the 1,000 trips per day, fearing it would <br />engender a parade of trucks along the route. <br />Further discussion ensued among Commissioners, staff, and area residents and <br />professionals, regarding the road materials and the trip truck end thresholds. <br />Commissioner Wheeler opined that the Board was losing sight of the problem, <br />which is heavy mining in AG -1. He felt that the Board should be very restrictive on what is <br />allowed in AG -1, because it is more heavily populated than AG -2 or AG -3. <br />19 <br />December 19, 2008 <br />Special Call Mining Regulations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.