Laserfiche WebLink
follow the regulations of Chapter 902;howevef-, no fee shat <br />rte:seer_�:a�:r�.�:eee!srrr�ss�es:ssrs!�e!e!��� <br />Commissioners Wheeler and O'Bryan presented arguments, in succession, <br />supporting the appeal fee waiver, as presented in Item (8). <br />residents: <br />Staff and Commissioners addressed questions and remarks posed by the following <br />Susan Boyd, 8025 25th Street <br />Chuck Kramer, 10761 US 1 <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 2-2 <br />vote (Commissioners O'Bryan and Wheeler opposed, <br />Chairman Davis recused himself), the Motion to strike the <br />appeal fee waiver FAILED. <br />The Chairman announced that the standard appeal process would apply. <br />Mr. Taube made observations regarding the Board's decision on December 8, <br />2008, to have its own expert review of the hydro -geological report. <br />Further discussion ensued among Commissioners, staff, Director Boling, and area <br />residents and professionals, relative to the hydrology report requirements. <br />Mr. Kramer expressed his appreciation to staff, and thanked the Board for the <br />time allowing him to work on the project. <br />38 <br />December 19, 2008 <br />Special Call Mining Regulations <br />