My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/21/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
2/21/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:00:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/21/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED WHO MAKES THE CERTIFICATION, AND MR. <br />NELSON FELT IT COULD BE DONE BY THE PURCHASING AGENT. <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED WHAT HAPPENS IF A LEGAL QUESTION ARISES, <br />AND MR. NELSON STATED THAT THEY CAN TELEPHONE THE ATTORNEY. Hip FURTHER <br />NOTED THAT BID OPENINGS CAN BE ADJOURNED AND REOPENED. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT DOCUMENTATION THAT THE BIDS WERE LEGALLY <br />RECEIVED SHOULD COME FROM OUR ATTORNEY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE INITIALLY WILL REVIEW THE BID <br />PROCESS AND SEE TO WHAT DEGREE HIS INVOLVEMENT IS NECESSARY. HE DID NOT <br />SEE WHY, IF WE HAVE A CERTIFICATION THAT THESE WERE RECEIVED AT SUCH A <br />TIME AND PLACE, HE COULDNIT REVIEW THE AD FOR COMPLIANCE AT A LATER DATE. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO NOTIFYING DISQUALIFIED BIDDERS, <br />AND MR. NELSON POINTED OUT THAT THE GUIDELINES STATE THAT "UNSUCCESSFUL <br />BIDDERS WILL NOT BE NOTIFIED." <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR <br />SHOULD MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS IN REGARD TO A BID COMMITTEE, AND WE WOULD <br />PROCEED FROM THERE TO SEE HOW IT WORKS OUT. <br />COMMISSIONER $IEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE WISHED TO MAKE <br />A MOTION IN REGARD TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER $IEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER Lo Y, THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BE AUTHORIZED TO HAVE A POSITION <br />OF PLANNER 2, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT IT IS NOT CONSTRUED TO MEAN AN <br />+ INCREASE IN THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL IN THAT DEPARTMENT. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS INQUIRED ABOUT THE REASON FOR SUCH A MOTION, <br />AND COMMISSIONER $IEBERT EXPLAINED THAT THERE IS QUALIFIED PERSONNEL IN <br />THIS DEPARTMENT WHO HAS BEEN DOING THE JOB OF A PLANNER 2 FOR SOMETIME, <br />AND A POSSIBILITY THAT THEY WILL BE PUT INTO SUCH A CLASSIFICATION. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THIS HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE <br />PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT IT HAS NOT AT <br />THIS POINT. HE CONTINUED THAT IT WILL BE DISCUSSED WITH THE PEOPLE MAKING <br />THE JOB CLASSIFICATION STUDY AND NOTED THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO <br />CREATING SUCH A CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT; BUT ASKED IF <br />IT IS THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE WILL Be NO CHANGES MADE UNTIL WE GO <br />THROUGH THE COMPLETE EVALUATION. <br />73 <br />FEB 211979 <br />B60K 39 PACE x.54 <br />d <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.