Laserfiche WebLink
AS WE DO THE DESIGN, WE CAN GET INTO MORE SPECIFICS, DETERMINE THE <br />QUALITY OF MATERIALS, THE AMOUNT OF RENOVATION NECESSARY, HOW THE SPACE <br />-IS GOING TO WORK OUT, ETC., AND AT THAT TIME,CAN GET A MUCH BETTER IDEA <br />OF THE ACTUAL COST. WE MIGHT EVEN BE ABLE TO TELL THE ARCHITECTS WHAT <br />MAXIMUM COST FIGURE WE WANT THEM TO WORK WITHIN AND APPROACH IT ON THAT <br />BASIS. CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT MR. BOWEN CAUTIONED THAT IT IS NECESSARY <br />TO BE VERY CAREFUL IN RENOVATION BECAUSE EVERY WALL YOU SUBTRACT IS A MINUS <br />AND THEN IT COSTS TO RENOVATE AFTER THAT; SO, IF YOU MAKE TOO MANY SUB- <br />TRACTIONS, YOUR COSTS GO UP WAY OUT OF PROPORTION AND YOU CAN STILL END <br />UP WITH A 20 YEAR OLD SHELL. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT THE NEXT STEP IS THE "AS BUILT" <br />DRAWINGS BECAUSE THESE MUST BE DONE BEFORE THE ARCHITECT CAN GO INTO <br />THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN. HE SUGGESTED THAT A CONTRACT FOR THE AS BUILT <br />DRAWINGS AND DESIGN PHASE BE BASED ON A CONTRACT JUST LIKE THE ORIGINAL <br />CONTRACT, WITH A MAXIMUM FEE AND BASED ON THE ARCHITECT'S COST PLUS PER= <br />CENT OF ACTUAL MAN HOURS EXPENDED; THEN, WHEN WE GO INTO CONSTRUCTION, <br />WE WILL BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE THAT CONTRACT BASED ON A MORE ACCURATE <br />CONSTRUCTION COST FIGURE. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT IT CONCERNS HIM THAT THE <br />ARCHITECTS LATEST PROPOSAL Ij STILL BASED ON 20% OF 8-1/2% OF.THE <br />ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST OF 3.277 MILLION. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON POINTED OUT THAT THIS IS ONLY <br />FOR THIS PHASE UNTIL THEY ARE ABLE TO WORK OUT MORE ACCURATE COSTS, AND <br />THEIR FEE IS LIMITED AT $69,209. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED WHETHER WE WOULD RECEIVE CREDIT IF { <br />IT IS FOUND THAT THIS COST PROJECTION IS VERY HIGH WHEN WE GET INTO THE f <br />CONSTRUCTION PHASE. <br />•CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT HE ASKED THE SAME QUESTION, AND <br />THE ARCHITECTS SAID THEY HAD TAKEN A PROJECTION OF THE MAN HOURS IT WOULD <br />, <br />TAKE TO DO THIS PARTICULAR <br />PHASE AND IT CAME OUT VERY CLOSE TO THEIR <br />. <br />ORIGINAL FIGURE. <br />MR. SINGH, OF CONNELL, METCALF & EDDY, AGREED. HE STATED <br />THAT IF THE ARCHITECTS SHOULD SPEND ONLY $3,000 DURING THE SCHEMATIC <br />DESIGN PHASE, THAT IS WHAT THE COUNTY WOULD PAY. THE $69,000 FIGURE IS <br />THE TOP LIMIT FIGURE. <br />35 <br />MAS 7 1979 � . <br />