My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/7/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
3/7/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:02:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/07/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. SIMPSON STATED THAT $7,116 FOR THE DESIGN PHASE IS THE <br />LOWEST FIGURE THEY CAN ASSESS AT THIS TIME. HE THEN DISCUSSED HOW THEY <br />ARRIVE AT THE $30,000 FEE FOR THE SERVICES OF .JOHN SAXON, PLUS $2,500 <br />AUTOMOBILE EXPENSE, EXPLAINING THAT ON A 10 MONTH TIME SCHEDULE, THEY <br />ESTIMATE 100 HOURS A MONTH, OR A TOTAL OF 1,000 MAN HOURS. HE STATED <br />THAT IF HE DIDNIT HAVE A LOT OF CONFIDENCE IN MR. SAXON, HE WOULD NOT <br />BE MAKING THIS PROPOSAL. MR. SIMPSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IN THE <br />CONSTRUCTION PHASE, THEY WILL BE GLAD TO WORK EITHER ON AN HOUR TO HOUR <br />REIMBURSABLE TYPE OF SITUATION OR ON THE LUMP SUM BASIS. HE NOTED THAT <br />ON THE LUMP SUM BASIS, IF IT GOES OVER 1,000 HOURS, THE -BOARD WOULD GET <br />THE ADVANTAGE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED HIS ONLY PREFERENCE IS TO SET A <br />MAXIMUM FIGURE AND THEN GO ON AN HOURLY BASIS ItNOTTO EXCEEDSO THAT <br />THE COUNTY KNOWS THERE IS A CAP. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED MR. SIMPSON IF HE WISHED TO GO ON AN <br />HOURLY BASIS WITH A MAXIMUM CAP, AND MR. SIMPSON STATED THAT HE HAS TRIED <br />TO KEEP THE PROPOSAL AS LOW AS HE POSSIBLY CAN AND IF THE COUNTY WANTS <br />AN HOURLY BASIS, THERE HAS TO BE SOME FLEXIBILITY ON THE UPPER SIDE TOO. <br />HE CONTINUED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL HIS COMPANY COULD ADEQUATELY DISCHARGE <br />THEIR OBLIGATION IN CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION IN MUCH LESS THAN THE AMOUNT <br />OF HOURS SET OUT AND HE WOULD NOT WANT TO TRY T0, <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AGREES THIS <br />IS A REASONABLE PROPOSAL AND FURTHER STATED THAT HE DOES NOT KNOW OF TWO <br />MORE QUALIFIED MEN IN THIS WHOLE DISTRICT TO HANDLE A PROJECT OF THIS <br />KIND. HE FELT WE ARE FORTUNATE TO GET SUCH A PROPOSAL. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE THEN SUGGESTED HAVING THE AGREEMENT ON A 10 <br />MONTH BASIS; AND IF IT SHOULD RUN INTO 12 MONTHS, WE WOULD HAVE TO PAY <br />MORE. <br />-,%. MR, SIMPSON STATED THAT THE PROPOSAL AS PRESENTED IS ABOUT AS <br />GOOD A PACKAGE AS HE CAN PUT TOGETHER, AND HE WOULD NOT WANT TO HAVE TO <br />HIRE AN INSPECTOR TO CHECK ON THE JOB INSTEAD OF A REGISTERED ENGINEER. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE ENGINEERING FEE PROPOSAL OF <br />39 <br />IOU <br />MAR 71979 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.