Laserfiche WebLink
m <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED ABOUT TRACT A, AND MR. BERG STATED <br />THAT THERE IS A RELATIVELY NEW BARN THERE,AND THE OWNER DOES NOT FEEL <br />HE SHOULD BE MADE TO TEAR IT DOWN. MR, BERG NOTED THAT THE SUBDIVISION <br />tREVIEW COMMITTEE APPROVED THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CAMELOT SUBDIVISION <br />SUBJECT TO CLARIFICATION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. <br />MR. HOWARD STATED THAT KELLEY ROAD LIES SOUTH OF THE QUARTER <br />SECTION LINE AND THERE IS NOTHING TO THE WEST. HE COMMENTED THAT THERE <br />IS AN EXISTING DIRT ROAD, WHICH IS NOT MAINTAINED OR DEDICATED,,ABOVE <br />THE 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY, BUT THERE IS NOTHING ABOVE THE LINE EXTENDING. <br />WEST. HE AGREED THAT AT SOME FUTURE TIME THE COUNTY WOULD WANT TO <br />ACQUIRE MORE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO MATCH UP, BUT HE DID NOT KNOW WHEN THIS <br />WOULD COME ABOUT. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED THAT WHEN MR, HOWARD CAME BEFORE <br />THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE, THE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED HAD A 15' <br />DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH PART OF THIS PROPERTY SO THE DISCUSSION <br />CAME UP ABOUT KELLEY ROAD. THE ADMINISTRATOR CONTINUED THAT SINCE THAT <br />TIME THEY HAVE -DONE SOME STUDYING, ANI} THERE IS A PROBLEM THAT HE FEELS <br />SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BOARD. HE PRESENTED AN AERIAL <br />OF THE PROPERTY UNDER DISCUSSION AND EXPLAINED THAT THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT <br />HAS SET UP A 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY,- 30' FOR ROAD AND 30' FOR DRAINAGE <br />PURPOSES. THROUGH THE -YEARS AS SUBDIVISIONS WENT ON RECORD IN HERE, AN <br />ADDITIONAL 35' ON THEIR SOUTH LINES WAS SET ASIDE FOR ROAD PURPOSES. <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR NOTED THAT KELLEY ROAD LIES ONE MILE SOUTH OF OSLO <br />ROAD, AND IT IS MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY WITHIN THE AREAS OF THE SUBDI- <br />VISIONS. PEOPLE, BY USAGE, HAVE CONTINUED IT ON THROUGH, AND HE BELIEVED <br />IT WILL EVENTUALLY BE A THROUGH ARTERY. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED <br />HOW THE CANAL IS LOCATED IN RELATION TO THE RIGH.T-OF-WAY AND STATED <br />THAT ALIGNMENT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY IS THE PROBLEM BECAUSE SOMEDAY THERE WILL <br />HAVE TO BE A BRIDGE OVER THE CANAL. HE NOTED THAT THEY DID TALK ABOUT <br />60' COMING ACROSS MR, DELTUFO'S PROPERTY TO TIE IN BUT FELT IT MIGHT BE <br />UNFAIR TO TAKE THAT 60' FROM ONE PROPERTY OWNER. THE ADMINISTRATOR <br />EMPHASIZED THAT THE PROBLEM OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A FUTURE BRIDGE MUST <br />BE CONSIDERED. <br />14 <br />