Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />WAS GRANTED SUBJECT TO A NOTE RE DEED RESTRICTIONS BEING INCLUDED ON <br />THE FINAL PLAT, STATING THAT THIS SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE <br />OF A CITRUS AREA AND COULD ANTICIPATE ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE CITRUS <br />BUSINESS. <br />MR. MUSICK ASKED HOW THIS SHOULD BE WORDED, AND ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS FELT POSSIBLY ATTORNEY O'HAIRE HAD PREPARED SOME DEED RESTRIC- <br />TIONS. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS SUGGESTED THAT A NOTE COULD BE PUT ON <br />THE PLAT STATING THAT IT IS SUBJECT TO -DEED RESTRICTIONS FILED AT <br />BOOK N0. PAGE NO. , AND THEN THE DEED RESTRICTIONS COULD BE <br />EXAMINED BY THE ATTORNEY TO SEE IF THEY INCLUDE AERIAL SPRAYING. <br />IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THIS COULD BE DONE, BUT THE CHAIRMAN <br />NOTED THAT IN THIS CASE, THE BOARD COULD NOT SIGN NOW. THE ADMINISTRATOR <br />STATED THAT IF THE BOARD WOULD GO AHEAD AND SIGN IT, HE WOULD NOT SIGN <br />IT UNTIL HE HAS SEEN THE DEED RESTRICTIONS. <br />ON LOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAI: APPROVAL TO CITRUS HIDEWAY <br />SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO REFERENCE EITHER BY DEED RESTRICTION OR STATEMENT <br />ON THE PLAT THAT AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED ON THE SURROUNDING <br />PROPERTIES MAY HAVE SOME AFFECT. <br />,DANA HOWARD OF CARTER ASSOCIATES APPEARED REPRESENTING RALPH <br />DELTUFO IN REQUESTING TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF CAMELOT SUBDIVISION. <br />ASSISTANT PLANNER BOB BERG INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS SUB- <br />DIVISION IS LOCATED NORTH OF KELLEY ROAD (13TH ST., S.W.), EAST OF <br />LATERAL J CANAL, AND WEST OF DIXIE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION. AT THE SUBDI- <br />VISION REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING IT WAS NOTED THAT A PORTION OF KELLEY <br />ROAD WAS NOT DEDICATED, AND THEY DISCUSSED THE POSSIBILITY OF BUILDING A <br />BRIDGE ACROSS LATERAL J CANAL AT SOME FUTURE DATE, WHEN THERE IS A NEED. <br />MR. BERG CONTINUED THAT A SET OF PLANS WAS RECEIVED THIS MORNING, WHICH <br />AMENDED THE PLAN TO SHOW A 30' RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE <br />PROPERTY IN QUESTION. THIS DOES NOT NECESSARILY LINE UP WITH KELLEY <br />ROAD ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE CANAL, AND ADDITIONAL RIGHT -QF -WAY MIGHT <br />BE NECESSARY IN THE FUTURE. <br />11, 1(. Li <br />1 <br />13 <br />