My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/10/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
02/10/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:20:20 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:03:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/10/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2926
Book and Page
126, 511-542
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
410
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Anything else would have to be approved by the Board. He said the county has been inactive for <br />years and it is important to make provisions to allow industry like this to come into the county. <br /> <br />Bill Mills <br />from the Real Estate Management Group is handling the industrial park on the <br />south side of SR-60. He felt it is unfair to single out just one developer, change the code, and not <br />give the same concessions to other developers. If they approve anything it should be done equally. <br /> <br />Charles Sullivan Jr., <br /> one of the principals in MOTO, Inc., stated they are in the process <br />of obtaining final plat approval for their industrial park on the south side of SR-60 directly across <br />from this 100 acre park. It would be reasonable and fair to receive the same opportunity that the <br />100 acre park would have to attract businesses. If they could comply with the same setbacks and <br />the same desire to preserve the visual integrity, then there is no reason why their park could not <br />accommodate the height limitations. <br />Chairman Ginn told Mr. Sullivan that he is reinforcing some issues that have been <br />brought up today. <br /> <br />Jackie James, <br />In response to a question by Director Keating explained that this is county <br />property and it would not apply to residents living in the cities. <br /> <br />th <br />Tim Zork, <br /> 4415 5 Place SW, asked the audience to flash back 8 years when they had an <br />unknown applicant requesting to modify a particular LDR because of a potential client. Later it <br />became known that it was Disney bringing a vacation property to the beach. Subsequent to that <br />there was an outlandish cry from the public. He felt although they are unknown to the public they <br />could bring a good and positive outcome to the community. <br />nd <br />Alice Rowe, <br />925 32 Avenue, Vero Beach, said the residents she has talked to are very <br />upset with the development that they are seeing. They cannot attend the meetings to express their <br />opinion because they are working. <br /> <br />February 10, 2004 <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.