Laserfiche WebLink
MR. SHEA STATED HE HAD NO OBJECTION TO THE BUILDING OF HOMES ON <br />"THE SEXTON PROPERTY BUT QUESTIONED THE DRAINAGE SITUATION, NOTING THAT <br />THE DRAINAGE HAS OVERFLOWED AND COME UP IN HIS BACK YARD. HE ASKED IF <br />THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE A DRAINAGE DITCH ON THEIR SIDE OF THE EASEMENT, <br />ENGINEER BEINDORF STATED THEY WOULD LEAVE AN ADDITIONAL 2O' <br />WHICH WOULD JOIN WITH THE 20' THE SEXTONS LEFT SEVERAL YEARS AGO AND <br />IMPROVE THE DRAINAGE FOR THE EXISTING DITCH. HE NOTED THAT IT WOULD BE <br />FOOLISH TO HAVE TWO DITCHES, AND STATED THAT.THE COUNTY DOES MAINTAIN <br />THE DITCH NOW. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT THE SEXTONS WOULD HAVE TO IMPROVE <br />THAT DITCH TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COUNTY, AND THE DRAINAGE COULD ONLY <br />IMPROVE. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT ALTHOUGH THE QUESTION OF THE ROAD <br />WILL HAVE TO COME UP AT ANOTHER HEARING, HE WISHED TO STATE AT THIS <br />TIME THAT HE DID NOT INTEND TO VOTE FOR ANY SUBDIVISION PLAT WHICH WOULD <br />SHOW A ROAD GOING THROUGH. <br />DR. NICHOLAS LIMBERIS OF 152E 48TH COURT FELT THAT MOST OF THE <br />OBJECTIONS HE HAD DURING THE PLANNING & ZONING MEETING HAVE BEEN ANSWERED <br />TODAY. HE'STATED HE WAS NOT AGAINST THE REZONING TO RESIDENTIAL, BUT <br />WOULD MUCH PREFER TO HAVE IT ZONED R -IE TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE MANOR - <br />LIKE ATMOSPHERE OF MAGNOLIA ESTATES, WHICH IS CONTIGUOUS AND HAS LOTS <br />EXCEEDING ONE ACRE. HE THEN DISCUSSED DETERMINING A LEGAL PROCEDURE TO <br />DEED 48TH COURT BACK TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN MAGNOLIA ESTATES SO IT <br />COULD BECOME A PRIVATE ROAD AND ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING IT <br />BECOME A THOROUGHFARE TO THE SEXTON PROPERTY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED HIM THAT IF ALL THE PROPERTY OWNERS <br />AGREED AND CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND FILED'A PLAT IN REGARD TO THE ROAD, <br />THIS COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THE PROPERTY OWNERS <br />MIGHT WISH TO CONSIDER REZONING.TO R -1E TO FURTHER PROTECT THEMSELVES. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE FELT WE HAVE GONE ABOUT AS FAR AS <br />WE CAN GO TODAY IN INDICATING THAT WE DON'T WANT THE TRAFFIC TO GO <br />THROUGH ARD SO HAS THE DEVELOPER. HE REITERATED THAT WE CANNOT GRANT <br />A ZONING CONTINGENT UPON ANY FACTORS BECAUSE CONTRACTUAL ZONING IS <br />ILLEGAL, BUT THE STATEMENTS MADE TODAY WILL APPEAR IN THE MINUTES. <br />0 <br />a <br />51 <br />39 PACE 459 <br />'A <br />