My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/17/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
02/17/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:20:59 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:03:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/17/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2926
Book and Page
126, 543-583
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
411
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />homeowners”. She also addressed wildlife concerns and containment of employees. The <br />employees’ paychecks will stimulate new business, new home buying, and will help the total <br />economy. She hoped the Board would move on with this and adopt the ordinance. <br />Bob Johnson <br />, Coral Wind Subdivision, believed that because this is a PD the Board will <br />have control over certain situations. He saw no provision for churches in the industrial park and <br />thought there should be an allowance for a church there, such as the Salvation Army or a chapel. <br />Mr. Heady <br /> wanted to know the total amount to be spent on infrastructure, and also who the <br />end-user for the 80’ building will be. <br />Director Keating advised that the County is not looking at any contribution at this time and, <br />up to this time, the developer has not requested a subsidy. The amount would be limited to $1.5 <br />million for roads and water and sewer lines in the park, but that would come to the Commission for <br />a separate vote. <br />Ms. Chandler <br /> explained that one of the main concerns in attracting someone for new <br />business is having a certain degree of secrecy. This is very normal. The information is not divulged <br />so that a competitor does not step in to jeopardize the plans. <br />Bill Lord <br />, 2822 Cardinal Drive, had 2 concerns about the project: the 80-foot height, which <br />he thought is a bad precedent, and that a property owner (Mr. Johnson) did not learn of this until <br />2 weeks ago (according to an article in the newspaper). <br />Chairman Ginn thought the last concern was based on inaccurate information. <br /> <br />The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard with regard to this matter. There <br />being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Adams indicated her approval of the rezoning but mentioned her concerns <br />about the east exit onto SR-60, the impacts of construction on the neighbors, and her preference <br />that the commercial usage be removed and the project be kept industrial. <br />Vice Chairman Neuberger discussed traffic signal placement. <br />February 17, 2004 12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.