My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/9/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
5/9/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:01:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/09/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THEY EFFECTIVELY GOT FREE. HE FELT, HOWEVER, THAT THESE ARE NOT CRITICAL <br />AREAS, AND THE COUNTY PROBABLY WILL NEVER BUY THEM BACK. THE OVERALL <br />AGREEMENT DOES A LOT OF GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE IN THESE AREAS WHO NEED <br />SERVICE AND PRESENTLY CAN'T GET IT, AND HE, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDS'APPROVAL <br />OF THE SQUARING -OFF AGREEMENT. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THE BUY-BACK FORMULA IS PROBABLY NEGO- <br />TIABLE, BUT THAT THE PLACE TO CHANGE IT IS IN THE TOTAL AGREEMENT AND <br />HE WOULD NOT WANT TO HOLD UP THIS PRESENT AGREEMENT. HE FELT THE ODDS <br />ARE VERY SLIGHT THAT WE WOULD INCORPORATE INTO THESE AREAS. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SIEBERT, TO AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN ANNEX 3 TO THE TRIPARTITE <br />AGREEMENT, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT WERE <br />CHANGED, WHETHER ANNEX 3 WOULD BE IN CONFLICT WITH IT, AND ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS STATED THAT IF WE EVER CHANGED THE ORIGINAL WE WOULD CHANGE IT <br />AND THE ANNEXES. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE DISCUSSED AREAS WE MIGHT BE REQUIRED TO SERVICE <br />WITH SEWER UNDER THE 201 FACILITIES FLAN. HE -NOTED THAT UNDER THE <br />TRIPARTITE FLAN, IF WE TAKE OVER AREAS THE CITY IS PRESENTLY SERVICING <br />WITH SEWER, WE ALSO HAVE TO SERVICE THEM WITH WATER, I.E., IF WE HAVE <br />TO TAKE OVER THE HOSPITAL, WE WOULD ALSO HAVE TO SERVICE THEM WITH WATER <br />PURCHASED FROM THE CITY AND PAY THE REPLACEMENT COST OF THE WATER LINES <br />THAT THE HOSPITAL HAS PAID FOR TO THE CITY BASED ON THE BUY-BACK FORMULA. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT.IS SO, IF WE CANNOT RENEGOTIATE, <br />HE NOTED THAT WE ALREADY HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY THE CHAIRMAN IS DIS- <br />CUSSING, AND ALL ANNEX 3 DOES IS CLARIFY THE WATER RESPONSIBILITY FOR <br />THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND ALLOW THE CITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO ADJACENT <br />NEIGHBORS. <br />THE CHAIRMAN EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT ANNEX 3 AFFECTING OUR <br />1.39 MILLION SEWER ALLOCATION IPJ ANY WAY, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED <br />THAT IT STATES "THERE IS NO SEWER ALLOCATION ALLOCATED TO ANY OF SAID <br />LOCATIONS." <br />73 <br />MAY 91979 BOOK A® <br />PAGE278 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.