My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/17/2009 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2009
>
02/17/2009 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 12:22:26 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:21:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/17/2009
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4025
Book and Page
136, 802-861
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7331
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
designation for ±40.23 acres from R (Rural Residential) to L-1 (Low Density Residential -1, and <br />to rezone the 40.23 acres from A-1 (Agricultural -1 District to RS -3 (Single Family Residential <br />District -1), was denied. Subsequent to the Board's denial of the request, Double R&D filed a <br />lawsuit against the County. Attorney Glen then presented a summary of the action which led to <br />the ongoing litigation, the alleged basis of the litigation, along with a proposed settlement <br />supported by the County Attorney's Office. <br />Chairman Davis's position was, this is inside the Urban Service Area; it is <br />adjacent to the City of Sebastian; and it has never been an issue as far as the increase in density <br />from the L-1 in the Comp Plan to the RS -3 (up to 3/units per acre). It was always his intent that <br />we would not increase their density and then buy the right of way for a road. He was in favor of <br />it, as long as we get right of way, but was not in favor of up -zoning it then buying it. <br />Commissioner Wheeler said it looked like they were trying to shore up their <br />position for a lawsuit against the County by saying we are requiring contract zoning. He did not <br />think one could hold zoning over someone else's head to get something from them. <br />County Attorney Collins agreed that you cannot hold zoning over their heads, but <br />a Comprehensive Plan amendment is much more discretionary, which they have to get before <br />they are entitled to an up -zoning. <br />Commissioner Wheeler agreed that we need to move forward but wanted to make <br />sure we are not setting -up ourselves, again. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, <br />SECONDED by Vice Chairman Flescher, to approve <br />staff's recommendation, and to move forward on the <br />settlement along the terms proposed. <br />February 17, 2009 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.