My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/17/2009 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2009
>
02/17/2009 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 12:22:26 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:21:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/17/2009
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4025
Book and Page
136, 802-861
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7331
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Bryan would not accept some of the proposals. Commissioners <br />Wheeler and Flescher wanted to move forward, and there was consensus that Mr. Mensing <br />would make his contacts, while the Board take no action. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the <br />Motion carried unanimously. The Board approved <br />staff's recommendation for Option 1, to take no <br />action. <br />14. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS <br />A. COMMISSIONER WESLEY S. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN <br />1. Two YEAR MORATORIUM FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES <br />Chairman Davis, following up from discussions at the recent Economic Summit <br />in Sebastian, submitted a proposal for Board consideration and approval of a two-year <br />moratorium on all non-residential impact fees. <br />Attorney Collins explained the difficulties of charging impact fees for residential <br />projects but not for commercial or industrial, by pointing out the fairness factors involved. <br />The Board had lengthy and in-depth discussions which involved the fairness and <br />legality of the proposal; the need to have another workshop to discuss the ideas, suggestions and <br />opinions brought out today; the urgent need to act now; inconsistency in the formula that is used <br />to determine impact fees for commercial properties; and the impact fee regulations and whether <br />or not it is justified. <br />February 17, 2009 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.