Laserfiche WebLink
Director Olson addressed questions on the biosolids (sludge) by advising that a different <br />process than previously used at the Gifford facility would be used. He indicated where it would <br />be located on the aerial photograph displayed on the screen. <br />Discussion ensued regarding options for the property to the north; permitting the <br />property; necessary wetland set-asides; aesthetics for the “gateway” to the county; depth of the <br />property; political pressures opposing moving the Landfill to the north; option to sell the <br />property later; diplomatic approach to the planning; building options with DEP and continuation <br />of permitting procedures; permitting costs; feasibility and alternatives; and other concerns. <br /> <br />The motion was clarified as being to approve Staff’s Recommendation and move forward <br />with the alternative plan as suggested by staff instead of proceeding to the north to Oslo Road. <br /> <br />It was understood that staff would come back to the Board with a plan of what might be <br />good use of the property (along Oslo Road). Staff will come back with feasibility and costs <br />associated with the alternative plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis complimented staff on their diplomatic approach to this. <br /> <br />Tom Collin <br />, President of Flying Ranch Homeowners Association, expressed concern <br />about the odors experienced since Hurricane Wilma. He called staff’s plan logical and he was <br />pleased to hear the Commissioners’ concerns. He was also concerned about the appearance of <br />the Landfill from I-95. <br /> <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried <br />unanimously (by a vote of 4-0, Commissioner Bowden absent). <br />February 21, 2006 <br />3 <br />S.W.D.D. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />