Laserfiche WebLink
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF BY APPROVING THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN <br />WE ARE EFFECTIVELY APPROVING THE FINAL PLAN FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD. <br />MR. KONTOULAS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE RECEIVED A CALL FROM <br />SUPERINTENDENT BURNS, WHO HAS WRITTEN THE BOARD A LETTER STATING THAT <br />THEY HAVE APPROVED THE PLAN SUBMITTED TO THEM BY MR. SINGH. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF MR. KONTOULAS HAD ANYTHING TO <br />RECOMMEND, AND MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT HE LIKES THE ALTERNATE PLAN <br />PRESENTED FOR THE COUNTY COMMISSION OFFICES, WHICH IS MORE FLEXIBLE. <br />HE NOTED THE APPROVAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM ALL OTHER AREAS, AND IT <br />IS NOW UP TO THE COMMISSIONERS. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED.BY.COMMISSIONER <br />LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PRESENTED BY <br />CONNELL, METCALF & EDDY INCORPORATING THE ALTERNATE PROPOSAL FOR THE <br />COUNTY COMMISSION OFFICES. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE HAVE BEEN PROVIDED <br />WITH A CONTRACT FORM, SOME OF WHICH WILL HAVE TO BE CHANGED, AND HE <br />HOPED THAT BY THE NEXT MEETING THE BOARD MIGHT GIVE FINAL APPROVAL. <br />THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT THERE ARE A LOT OF BIG HURDLES THAT HAVE TO BE <br />OVERCOME, AND HE WOULD SUGGEST DISCUSSION OF SUCH THINGS AS THE PERCENT- <br />AGE THAT IS GOING TO BE CHARGED, COST PLUS OR "NOT TO EXCEED," ETC. <br />HE ALSO FELT THAT THERE SHOULD BE SOME DISCUSSION AS TO WHAT THE PRO- <br />POSED COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE NOW. HE FELT IF THE BOARD COULD NAIL <br />DOWN THE BIG DOLLAR FIGURES, THAT ADMINISTRATIVELY A CONTRACT COULD <br />BE WORKED OUT. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED IF MR. SINGH FELT THE ALTERNATE DESIGN <br />FOR THE COUNTY COMMISSION ROOMS WILL MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN THE <br />COSTS, AND HE DID NOT FEEL THAT IT WOULD. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THEIR ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST <br />WORKS OUT AT APPROXIMATELY $21.00 PER SQ. FT. FOR THE HOSPITAL COMPLEX <br />AND $8.70 FOR THE COURTHOUSE. HE NOTED THAT HE FAILED TO ASK HOW THE <br />FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROVIDED FOR SERVICING THE SCHOOL BOARD WITH <br />UTILITIES VERSUS THE -OTHER PART OF THE BUILDING. <br />46 <br />JUN • 61,979 800K f <br />