My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/6/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
6/6/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:03:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/06/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />MR. SINGH STATED THAT THIS WILL BE WORKED OUT IN THE WORKING <br />DRAWINGS DEPENDING ON YOUR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, AND THE UTILITIES.CAN <br />BE METERED SEPARATELY FOR THE SCHOOL BOARD, <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT WE HAD ESTABLISHED THE FACT THAT THEY <br />WILL BE. HE ASKED IF MR, SINGH IS SAYING NO MATTER HOW THIS IS WORKED <br />OUT, IT WILL NOT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IN THE PRICE, AND MR. SINGH <br />CONCURRED. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT SOME OF THE PARAGRAPHS WILL HAVE TO BE <br />REWRITTEN ESTABLISHING RESPONSIBILITY ON THE PART OF THE ARCHITECT. <br />MR. KONTOULAS ASKED TO BE ALLOWED TO COMMENT. HE NOTED THAT <br />THE WAY THIS PROPOSAL IS WRITTEN WE ARE ASSUMING THAT BOTH PROJECTS <br />WILL BE UNDER ONE CONTRACT, AND HE CAN SEE SOME FAULTS IN THAT. FOR <br />EXAMPLE, AS REGARDS DEMOLITION, THE HOSPITAL BUILDING, OF COURSE, IS <br />EMPTY, BUT IF THIS SUBCONTRACTOR IS UNDER THIS SAME CONTRACT, HE WOULD <br />HAVE TO WAIT A YEAR OR BETTER TO GET INTO THE COURTHOUSE AND DO HIS <br />DEMOLITION. MR. KONTOULAS DID NOT FEEL ANY GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL <br />HOLD A SUB FOR A YEAR AND A HALF TO COMPLETE A CONTRACT AND WAS OF THE <br />OPINION THERE REALLY SHOULD BE TWO CONTRACTS BECAUSE OF THE TIME ELEMENT <br />INVOLVED. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED. <br />MR. KIRSCH, PROJECT PRINCIPAL FOR CONNELL, METCALF & EDDY, <br />STATED THAT YOU CAN SET UP A WORK SCHEDULE THROUGH THE PROJECT SO THAT <br />A CONTRACTOR KNOWS WHEN HE IS CALLED FOR, AND, THEREFORE, HE IS NOT <br />DELAYED IN HIS CONTRACT. HE FELT IT WOULD BE UNNECESSARY TO HAVE TWO <br />CONTRACTS AND MORE EXPENSIVE TO WRITE THEM UP. MR. KIRSCH FELT -THIS <br />WOULD REQUIRE A FURTHER WORKSHOP MEETING. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF HE BELIEVED HE COULD GET A BID TODAY <br />FROM SOMEONE WHO ISN'T GOING TO-DO ANY WORK UNTIL NINE MONTHS OR MORE <br />FROM NOW, AND MR. KIRSCH STATED THAT HE DID. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED ON THIS MATTER, AND THE CHAIRMAN STATED <br />THAT -HE WILL SET UP A DATE FOR A WORKSHOP. <br />CARL WEGENER CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING THE ROCKRIDGE <br />PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION AND CLAIMED THAT ALTHOUGH PEOPLE SAY THAT <br />ROCKRIDGE ALWAYS HAS HAD A BAD DRAINAGE SITUATION, ANY FLOOD THEY EVER <br />47 <br />JUN ,61979 <br />sotJ40 f <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.