My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/06/2007 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2007
>
02/06/2007 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2017 2:46:51 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:12:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/06/2007
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3128
Book and Page
132, 178-251
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3082
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vested rights, and density. Commissioners Davis and Bowden wanted to support staffs <br />recommendation. Attorney Collins explained to Commissioner O'Bryan what it would take for <br />the rezoning to be approvable. He also explained why the Board has no authority to approve. <br />Chairman Wheeler felt this hinges on Grand Harbor trying to keep its vesting <br />rights and he could not support that concept. He also did not like the idea of extending this <br />to 2012, agreed with staffs recommendation and opposed the rezoning. <br />Mr. Raines said he was willing to ask the Board to table the matter for a couple <br />weeks instead of the Board voting against it today. Chairman Wheeler was not opposed. <br />Discussion ensued among Board members, Mr. Seymour and others regarding <br />timeframe for tabling this item. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Davis, <br />SECONDED by Chairman Wheeler, to table Public <br />Hearing Items 9.A.3, 9.A.4 and 9.A.5 to the second meeting <br />in March 2007. <br />George Christopher felt they would have to re -advertise so it would not be a <br />time -certain. <br />Discussion continued on whether the developer's agreement would have to go back <br />Mr. Seymour suggested they table for thirty (30) days and let the traffic engineers <br />There was continued discussion on the Motion and whether to table to a time certain. <br />February 6, 2007 32 <br />to P&Z. <br />work this out. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.